Acer Predator PH317-51

Performance Results

Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation 26%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics52.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive56.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Predator PH317-51  (all builds)
MotherboardKBL Sienna_KLS
Memory5.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170706
Uptime19 Days
Run DateJun 03 '24 at 13:56
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 41%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
56.8% Above average
Memory 74.4
1-Core 84.4
2-Core 124
58% 94.4 Pts
4-Core 214
8-Core 318
33% 266 Pts
64-Core 392
24% 392 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 73%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630
Acer(1025 1208) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver.
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
5.68% Terrible
Lighting 6.6
Reflection 4.7
Parallax 6.9
5% 6.07 fps
MRender 5.8
Gravity 6.5
Splatting 9.7
6% 7.33 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.68%
Great: 6%
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile)
Acer(1025 1207) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2027 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
52.2% Above average
Lighting 63.1
Reflection 73.6
Parallax 65.1
51% 67.3 fps
MRender 67.8
Gravity 64.6
Splatting 64.9
54% 65.8 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFS256G39TND-N210A 256GB
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 30001P10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 191 235 206 125 109 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
56.8% Above average
Read 321
Write 226
Mixed 186
SusWrite 163
50% 224 MB/s
4K Read 17.8
4K Write 39.6
4K Mixed 20.1
74% 25.8 MB/s
DQ Read 324
DQ Write 190
DQ Mixed 126
129% 213 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 83%
Seagate ST2000LM007-1R8174 2TB
281GB free
Firmware: ACM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 43 42 42 40 40 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
18.8% Very poor
Read 23
Write 58.1
Mixed 34.2
SusWrite 41.5
29% 39.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 0.3
107% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 18.8%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR26D4S9D8MD-16 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
38% Below average
MC Read 13.9
MC Write 14.3
MC Mixed 11.9
38% 13.4 GB/s
SC Read 8.4
SC Write 11.1
SC Mixed 11.4
29% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 38%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 165 17.2" 1280 720 CMN1738
Typical Predator PH317-51 Builds (Compare 1,092 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop 61%
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Predator PH317-51

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 26% - Poor Total price: $49
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $119
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $325Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $418
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback