Asus M32CD4-K

Performance Results

Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics49% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive66.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus M32CD4-K  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK M32CD4-K
Memory8.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180316
Uptime5.2 Days
Run DateMay 29 '24 at 00:19
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$142
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
81.2% Excellent
Memory 87.7
1-Core 118
2-Core 231
82% 145 Pts
4-Core 404
8-Core 574
61% 489 Pts
64-Core 572
35% 572 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 81.2%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
CLim: 2050 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 560.38
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (60 fps cap detected)
49% Average
Lighting 60
Reflection 60
Parallax 60
49% 60 fps
MRender 60
Gravity 60
Splatting 60
49% 60 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 49%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFS128G32TND-N210A 128GB
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 30200P10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 134 136 136 137 136 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
66.9% Good
Read 428
Write 133
Mixed 156
SusWrite 136
47% 213 MB/s
4K Read 28.5
4K Write 64.6
4K Mixed 21
104% 38 MB/s
DQ Read 338
DQ Write 138
DQ Mixed 128
124% 201 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 75%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$24
669GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8K0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 180 179 167 177 180 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
95.7% Outstanding
Read 159
Write 157
Mixed 49.2
SusWrite 175
98% 135 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.5
132% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 95.7%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
73.3% Very good
MC Read 27.9
MC Write 28.4
MC Mixed 22.2
75% 26.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 27.3
SC Mixed 21.8
61% 21.3 GB/s
Latency 71.1
56% 71.1 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 120 27" 1280 720 DELA221 AW2724DM
Typical M32CD4-K Builds (Compare 702 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 19%
Desktop 73%
Workstation 16%

System: Asus M32CD4-K

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $171
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $119
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $325Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $418
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback