Performance Results

Gaming 335%
Desktop 116%
Workstation 340%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 115%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics303% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive437% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI  (all builds)
Memory23.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231013
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 27 '24 at 20:37
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D-$310
AM5, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Memory 96.7
1-Core 193
2-Core 362
117% 217 Pts
4-Core 716
8-Core 1,261
119% 989 Pts
64-Core 1,802
112% 1,802 Pts
Poor: 102%
This bench: 115%
Great: 122%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4080-S (Super)-$964
Asus(1043 8963) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5750 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 555.85
Performing below potential (65th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
303% Outstanding
Lighting 466
Reflection 438
Parallax 475
379% 460 fps
MRender 516
Gravity 388
Splatting 255
302% 386 fps
Poor: 283%
This bench: 303%
Great: 315%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB-$150
922GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 620361WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2676 2942 1982 1786 1701 1722 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
437% Outstanding
Read 4,076
Write 3,867
Mixed 3031
SusWrite 2,135
735% 3,277 MB/s
4K Read 57
4K Write 117
4K Mixed 67.3
234% 80.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,901
DQ Write 1,317
DQ Mixed 1,616
1,205% 1,611 MB/s
Poor: 293%
This bench: 437%
Great: 666%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL TZ/RJ/FX DDR5 6400 C36 2x16GB-$107
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
200% Outstanding
MC Read 81.1
MC Write 66.1
MC Mixed 71.8
209% 73 GB/s
SC Read 57.4
SC Write 73.6
SC Mixed 61.8
184% 64.3 GB/s
Latency 55.8
72% 55.8 ns
Poor: 136%
This bench: 200%
Great: 201%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 34: 0P 4R 3G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
34% 18% 68 213 55 165 31.5" 2560 1369 GBT3205 M32QC
Typical TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI Builds (Compare 362 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 414%
Desktop 118%
Workstation 422%

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $2,085
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $380
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback