Lenovo 82C4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 35%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.98% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 82C4  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory2.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220524
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 27 '24 at 10:42
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-1005G1
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
35% Below average
Memory 24.8
1-Core 111
2-Core 198
56% 111 Pts
4-Core 263
8-Core 242
34% 253 Pts
64-Core 154
10% 154 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 35%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD G1
Legend(17AA 3FDC) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9664
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
3.98% Terrible
Lighting 6.4
Reflection 5.8
Parallax 7.3
5% 6.5 fps
MRender 1
Gravity 0.2
Splatting 3.8
2% 1.67 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.98%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST1000LM049-2GH172 1TB
801GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LXMB
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 29 35 40 55 65 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
17.3% Very poor
Read 19.5
Write 29.3
Mixed 35.2
SusWrite 40.6
23% 31.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.1
33% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 17.3%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CWE M471A5244CB0-CTD 8GB
2667, 2667 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - RAM benchmark error
Poor: 29% Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 258 39 60 13.9" 1280 720 CMN14D6
Typical 82C4 Builds (Compare 582 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 82C4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $380
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback