Asus H97M-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics40.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus H97M-E  (all builds)
Memory9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160328
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMay 27 '24 at 02:25
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4590-$188
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
66.8% Good
Memory 91.2
1-Core 94.3
2-Core 183
72% 123 Pts
4-Core 240
8-Core 287
34% 264 Pts
64-Core 322
20% 322 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
Gigabyte(1458 400E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
40.2% Average
Lighting 52.4
Reflection 74.8
Parallax 46.6
43% 57.9 fps
MRender 39.6
Gravity 46.4
Splatting 42.8
35% 42.9 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Goodram SSD 120GB
2GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V3.10
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 368
Write 264
Mixed 216
62% 283 MB/s
4K Read 21.7
4K Write 64.3
4K Mixed 7.9
77% 31.3 MB/s
DQ Read 82.3
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 14
46% 97.5 MB/s
Poor: 38% Great: 65%
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G 256GB
134GB free
Firmware: 20170000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 355 369 383 390 381 399 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
125% Outstanding
Read 585
Write 563
Mixed 596
SusWrite 379
120% 531 MB/s
4K Read 36.7
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 45.5
174% 65 MB/s
DQ Read 660
DQ Write 499
DQ Mixed 671
477% 610 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 125%
Great: 171%
Fanxiang S101 1TB
121GB free
Firmware: SN14941
SusWrite @10s intervals: 265 328 326 333 328 355 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
82.3% Excellent
Read 333
Write 409
Mixed 355
SusWrite 323
80% 355 MB/s
4K Read 26.6
4K Write 74.9
4K Mixed 32.9
122% 44.8 MB/s
DQ Read 232
DQ Write 293
DQ Mixed 211
174% 246 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 82.3%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GU6MFR8C-PB 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
52.6% Above average
MC Read 19.9
MC Write 20.3
MC Mixed 13.7
51% 18 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 18.3
48% 16.9 GB/s
Latency 73.3
55% 73.3 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 36 9 75 21.5" 1280 720 ACR06AB SB220Q
Typical H97M-E Builds (Compare 2,583 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H97M-E - $99

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $267
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $423
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback