Performance Results

Gaming 219%
Desktop 128%
Workstation 262%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 131%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics171% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive426% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B760M-PLUS D4  (all builds)
Memory21.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231215
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateMay 25 '24 at 12:56
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-14900KF-$505
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
131% Outstanding
Memory 91.6
1-Core 234
2-Core 466
136% 264 Pts
4-Core 909
8-Core 1603
152% 1,256 Pts
64-Core 3,470
215% 3,470 Pts
Poor: 125%
This bench: 131%
Great: 136%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-Ti-$770
Zotac(19DA 5696) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3120 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 555.85
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (240 fps cap detected)
171% Outstanding
Lighting 240
Reflection 240
Parallax 240
196% 240 fps
MRender 240
Gravity 239
Splatting 174
174% 218 fps
Poor: 208%
This bench: 171%
Great: 256%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB-$150
368GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 620331WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3355 1055 1042 707 677 677 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
426% Outstanding
Read 4,055
Write 3,836
Mixed 3,125
SusWrite 1,252
686% 3,067 MB/s
4K Read 65.4
4K Write 232
4K Mixed 93.5
342% 130 MB/s
DQ Read 2,077
DQ Write 1,612
DQ Mixed 1,848
1,382% 1,846 MB/s
Poor: 293%
This bench: 426%
Great: 666%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3600 C18 2x8GB-$95
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
120% Outstanding
MC Read 45.3
MC Write 43.8
MC Mixed 43
126% 44 GB/s
SC Read 24.7
SC Write 48.5
SC Mixed 29.1
97% 34.1 GB/s
Latency 67.3
59% 67.3 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 120%
Great: 123%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 62 49 240 23.8" 1920 1080 AOCB203 24G2W1G8
Typical TUF GAMING B760M-PLUS D4 Builds (Compare 318 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 101%
Desktop 103%
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B760M-PLUS D4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 113% - Outstanding Total price: $456
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $380
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback