Asus X99-E WS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 107%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 103%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics151% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus X99-E WS  (all builds)
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190527
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 25 '24 at 00:13
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5960X-$504
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
75.4% Very good
Memory 84.8
1-Core 96.1
2-Core 186
71% 122 Pts
4-Core 355
8-Core 726
64% 541 Pts
64-Core 980
61% 980 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 75.4%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
MSI(1462 3901) ≥ 4GB; rtx 3070 suprim X
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.41
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
151% Outstanding
Lighting 224
Reflection 203
Parallax 193
182% 207 fps
MRender 195
Gravity 150
Splatting 134
127% 159 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 151%
Great: 158%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 1TB (2016)-$70
864GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 171 187 198 187 196 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
76.9% Very good
Read 80.3
Write 174
Mixed 26.5
SusWrite 186
84% 117 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 2
365% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 76.9%
Great: 111%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4DFD8266.M16FH 1x16GB
1 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
38.1% Below average
MC Read 18.3
MC Write 9.7
MC Mixed 9.8
36% 12.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 10.6
SC Mixed 11.9
35% 12.1 GB/s
Latency 76.2
52% 76.2 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 38.1%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 23.8" 1280 720 DELA0B5 DELL S2415H
Typical X99-E WS Builds (Compare 275 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 97%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 93%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus X99-E WS - $473

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $1,462
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback