Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics52.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive202% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF Z270 MARK 2  (all builds)
Memory13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171225
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 13 '18 at 20:32
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7600K-$190
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
97.1% Outstanding
Memory 97.2
1-Core 142
2-Core 285
97% 175 Pts
4-Core 560
8-Core 556
75% 558 Pts
64-Core 561
35% 561 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 97.1%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Asus(1043 851A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 390.65
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
52.2% Above average
Lighting 65
Reflection 62.8
Parallax 61.9
53% 63.2 fps
MRender 72.5
Gravity 61.5
Splatting 55.2
51% 63.1 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
300GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
93.8% Outstanding
Read 501
Write 401
Mixed 418
98% 440 MB/s
4K Read 32.6
4K Write 77.4
4K Mixed 44.4
147% 51.5 MB/s
DQ Read 43.3
DQ Write 102
DQ Mixed 22.7
32% 55.9 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 93.8%
Great: 134%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
131GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
202% Outstanding
Read 2,308
Write 1,050
Mixed 1,320
343% 1,559 MB/s
4K Read 36.6
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 24.8
141% 54.3 MB/s
DQ Read 47.8
DQ Write 153
DQ Mixed 118
85% 106 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 202%
Great: 236%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
51GB free
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
201% Outstanding
Read 2,259
Write 1,002
Mixed 1,259
331% 1,507 MB/s
4K Read 31.9
4K Write 117
4K Mixed 31.2
150% 60.1 MB/s
DQ Read 50.5
DQ Write 153
DQ Mixed 25.2
41% 76.3 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 201%
Great: 236%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$40
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
103% Outstanding
MC Read 38.2
MC Write 41.4
MC Mixed 30.5
105% 36.7 GB/s
SC Read 22.2
SC Write 38.5
SC Mixed 32
88% 30.9 GB/s
Latency 49.3
81% 49.3 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 103%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z270 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 1,896 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2 - $129

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $656
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback