User System

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop 16%
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 8.54%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics0.66% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 9 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Systemwortmann P5K
MotherboardASUSTeK P5K
Memory0.8 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20081014
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 13 '18 at 19:16
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 45%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Pentium 4 3.80GHz
LGA775, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
8.54% Terrible
SC Int 31.1
SC Float 22.9
SC Mixed 17
19% 23.7 Pts
QC Int 39.4
QC Float 28
QC Mixed 35.4
8% 34.3 Pts
MC Int 47
MC Float 33.8
MC Mixed 41.9
6% 40.9 Pts
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.54%
Great: 18%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9300 GE
Sapphire(174B 9820) 256MB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver.
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
0.66% Terrible
Lighting 1.6
Reflection 3.2
Parallax 0.4
0% 1.73 fps
MRender 3.1
Gravity 1.3
Splatting 2.2
1% 2.2 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.66%
Great: 1%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Hitachi HDS721050CLA362 500GB-$59
449GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JP2OA3EA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
50.7% Above average
Read 72.8
Write 104
Mixed 29.2
50% 68.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.42
4K Write 0.68
4K Mixed 0.24
57% 0.45 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 2x1GB
2 of 4 slots used
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
12.9% Very poor
MC Read 5.1
MC Write 3.7
MC Mixed 3.9
12% 4.23 GB/s
SC Read 3.7
SC Write 1.7
SC Mixed 3
8% 2.8 GB/s
Latency 147
27% 147 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 12.9%
Great: 22%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

The Best.
Intel Core i7-8700K $66Nvidia GTX 1070 $350Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $100
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $155Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $249Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $98
Intel Core i7-7700K $355AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $160
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $869SanDisk Extreme 64GB $42
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $140SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $60Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $157SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback