User System

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 15%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 7.3%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics0.69% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 9 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemeMachines eME644
MotherboardeMachines HM50-BZ
Memory1.2 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110620
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 13 '18 at 12:18
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
AMD C-50
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
7.3% Terrible
SC Int 19
SC Float 12.3
SC Mixed 15.1
12% 15.5 Pts
QC Int 37.4
QC Float 24.2
QC Mixed 29.9
7% 30.5 Pts
MC Int 37.7
MC Float 24.6
MC Mixed 29.8
5% 30.7 Pts
Poor: 3%
This bench: 7.3%
Great: 7%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6250
Acer(1025 0520) 256MB
Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
0.69% Terrible
Lighting 1.8
Reflection 2.5
Parallax 2.3
1% 2.2 fps
MRender 2
Gravity 1.2
Splatting 2.5
1% 1.9 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.69%
Great: 1%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2010)-$40
263GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
41% Average
Read 67.7
Write 75
Mixed 73.7
54% 72.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 1.36
4K Mixed 0.19
66% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 41%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Elpida EBJ21UE8BFU0-DJ-F 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1066 MHz
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
10.3% Very poor
MC Read 3.4
MC Write 2.6
MC Mixed 4.1
10% 3.37 GB/s
SC Read 2
SC Write 1.9
SC Mixed 2.7
6% 2.2 GB/s
Latency 185
22% 185 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.3%
Great: 29%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $370Nvidia GTX 1070 $350Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $100
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $155Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $249Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $98
Intel Core i7-7700K $355AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $869SanDisk Extreme 64GB $42
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $140SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $60Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $157SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback