Asus P8H67-M EVO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.3%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.03% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive35.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
MotherboardAsus P8H67-M EVO  (all builds)
Memory9.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120507
Uptime7.4 Days
Run DateJan 13 '18 at 12:09
Run Duration477 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i7-2600K-$375
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
58.3% Above average
SC Int 80.2
SC Float 83.7
SC Mixed 87.8
67% 83.9 Pts
QC Int 273
QC Float 272
QC Mixed 276
62% 274 Pts
MC Int 418
MC Float 423
MC Mixed 427
63% 423 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 86%
Graphics Cards Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4300
PwrHis(1787 2271) 256MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.26% Terrible
Lighting 5
Reflection 5.8
Parallax 4
1% 4.93 fps
MRender 3
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 3.2
1% 2.8 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.26%
Great: 1%
Intel HD 3000 (Desktop V2 1.35 GHz)-$15
Asus(1043 844D) 3GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
3.03% Terrible
Lighting 8.9
Reflection 10.8
Parallax 6.4
2% 8.7 fps
MRender 8.5
Gravity 5
Splatting 13
3% 8.83 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.03%
Great: 3%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Crucial C300-CTFDDAC064MAG 64GB
4GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0006 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
35.1% Below average
Read 347
Write 44.1
Mixed 48.7
31% 147 MB/s
4K Read 18.1
4K Write 31.5
4K Mixed 4.74
50% 18.1 MB/s
DQ Read 183
DQ Write 18.9
DQ Mixed 16.4
34% 72.8 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 35.1%
Great: 51%
Intel X25-M 40GB
3GB free
Firmware: 2CV102HD Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
14% Very poor
Read 157
Write 40.1
Mixed 68.1
19% 88.4 MB/s
4K Read 4.66
4K Write 9.34
4K Mixed 0.6
13% 4.87 MB/s
DQ Read 41.1
DQ Write 40.1
DQ Mixed 19
20% 33.4 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14%
Great: 33%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$124
245GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
78.1% Very good
Read 132
Write 140
Mixed 135
102% 136 MB/s
4K Read 0.93
4K Write 2.58
4K Mixed 0.29
118% 1.26 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 99%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$124
13GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
54.6% Above average
Read 99.8
Write 90.3
Mixed 98.3
73% 96.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.43
4K Write 1.92
4K Mixed 0.2
75% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 99%
WDC WD30 EFRX-68AX9N0 3TB
223GB free, PID 0183
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
33% Below average
Read 71
Write 71.8
Mixed 69.1
91% 70.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.81
4K Write 2.23
4K Mixed 0.25
87% 1.1 MB/s
WDC WD30 EFRX-68EUZN0 3TB
93GB free, PID 0183
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
33.7% Below average
Read 100
Write 67.7
Mixed 65
93% 77.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.32
4K Write 1.42
4K Mixed 0.21
57% 0.65 MB/s
SAMSUNG HD154UI 1.5TB
78GB free, PID 0183
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
30.1% Below average
Read 74.4
Write 67.6
Mixed 66.7
88% 69.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.47
4K Mixed 0.31
62% 0.73 MB/s
WDC WD30 EZRX-00MMMB0 3TB
71GB free, PID 0183
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
29.9% Poor
Read 72
Write 64
Mixed 68.2
87% 68.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.44
4K Write 1.75
4K Mixed 0.16
67% 0.78 MB/s
SAMSUNG HD154UI 1.5TB
19GB free, PID 0183
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
25.5% Poor
Read 59.1
Write 58.6
Mixed 64.2
79% 60.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.53
4K Write 1.29
4K Mixed 0.28
56% 0.7 MB/s
WDC WD30 EFRX-68EUZN0 3TB
10GB free, PID 0183
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
39.7% Below average
Read 102
Write 88.5
Mixed 88.5
117% 92.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.53
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.21
70% 0.85 MB/s
WDC WD30 EZRX-00MMMB0 3TB
6GB free, PID 0183
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
27.7% Poor
Read 72.9
Write 54.6
Mixed 75.9
86% 67.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.65
4K Write 1.65
4K Mixed 0.14
63% 0.81 MB/s
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown PUD31600C118G2VS 029E CMY16GX3M2A2400C11 0770 PUD31600C118G2VS 029E CMY16GX3M2A2400C11 32GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
42% Average
MC Read 14.3
MC Write 15.2
MC Mixed 13.7
41% 14.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 13.4
SC Mixed 12.3
35% 12.3 GB/s
Latency 81.7
49% 81.7 ns
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical P8H67-M EVO Builds (Compare 370 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus P8H67-M EVO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $501
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $370Nvidia GTX 1070 $360Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $100
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $155Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $249Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $110
Intel Core i7-7700K $355AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $147SanDisk Extreme 64GB $42
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $869SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $60Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $145SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback