Asus P8H67-M EVO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.23% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive35.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8H67-M EVO  (all builds)
Memory9.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120507
Uptime7.4 Days
Run DateJan 13 '18 at 12:09
Run Duration477 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
64.8% Good
Memory 79.4
1-Core 83.7
2-Core 166
64% 110 Pts
4-Core 272
8-Core 398
42% 335 Pts
64-Core 423
26% 423 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 83%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4300
PwrHis(1787 2271) 256MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.23% Terrible
Lighting 1.67
Reflection 2.23
Parallax 1.25
1% 1.72 fps
MRender 1.43
Gravity 0.73
Splatting 1.39
1% 1.18 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.23%
Great: 1%
Intel HD 3000 (Desktop V2 1.35 GHz)-$15
Asus(1043 844D) 3GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 2% Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial C300-CTFDDAC064MAG 64GB
4GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0006 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
35.1% Below average
Read 347
Write 44.1
Mixed 48.7
31% 147 MB/s
4K Read 18.1
4K Write 31.5
4K Mixed 4.74
50% 18.1 MB/s
DQ Read 183
DQ Write 18.9
DQ Mixed 16.4
34% 72.8 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 35.1%
Great: 53%
Intel X25-M 40GB
3GB free
Firmware: 2CV102HD Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
14% Very poor
Read 157
Write 40.1
Mixed 68.1
19% 88.4 MB/s
4K Read 4.66
4K Write 9.34
4K Mixed 0.6
13% 4.87 MB/s
DQ Read 41.1
DQ Write 40.1
DQ Mixed 19
20% 33.4 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 14%
Great: 36%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110
245GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
78.1% Very good
Read 132
Write 140
Mixed 135
102% 136 MB/s
4K Read 0.93
4K Write 2.58
4K Mixed 0.29
118% 1.26 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 100%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110
13GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
54.6% Above average
Read 99.8
Write 90.3
Mixed 98.3
73% 96.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.43
4K Write 1.92
4K Mixed 0.2
75% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 100%
WDC WD30 EFRX-68AX9N0 3TB
223GB free, PID 0183
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
33% Below average
Read 71
Write 71.8
Mixed 69.1
91% 70.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.81
4K Write 2.23
4K Mixed 0.25
87% 1.1 MB/s
WDC WD30 EFRX-68EUZN0 3TB
93GB free, PID 0183
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
33.7% Below average
Read 100
Write 67.7
Mixed 65
93% 77.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.32
4K Write 1.42
4K Mixed 0.21
57% 0.65 MB/s
SAMSUNG HD154UI 1.5TB
78GB free, PID 0183
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
30.1% Below average
Read 74.4
Write 67.6
Mixed 66.7
88% 69.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.47
4K Mixed 0.31
62% 0.73 MB/s
WDC WD30 EZRX-00MMMB0 3TB
71GB free, PID 0183
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
29.9% Poor
Read 72
Write 64
Mixed 68.2
87% 68.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.44
4K Write 1.75
4K Mixed 0.16
67% 0.78 MB/s
SAMSUNG HD154UI 1.5TB
19GB free, PID 0183
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
25.5% Poor
Read 59.1
Write 58.6
Mixed 64.2
79% 60.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.53
4K Write 1.29
4K Mixed 0.28
56% 0.7 MB/s
WDC WD30 EFRX-68EUZN0 3TB
10GB free, PID 0183
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
39.7% Below average
Read 102
Write 88.5
Mixed 88.5
117% 92.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.53
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.21
70% 0.85 MB/s
WDC WD30 EZRX-00MMMB0 3TB
6GB free, PID 0183
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
27.7% Poor
Read 72.9
Write 54.6
Mixed 75.9
86% 67.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.65
4K Write 1.65
4K Mixed 0.14
63% 0.81 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown PUD31600C118G2VS 029E CMY16GX3M2A2400C11 0770 PUD31600C118G2VS 029E CMY16GX3M2A2400C11 32GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
42% Average
MC Read 14.3
MC Write 15.2
MC Mixed 13.7
41% 14.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 13.4
SC Mixed 12.3
35% 12.3 GB/s
Latency 81.7
49% 81.7 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H67-M EVO Builds (Compare 309 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H67-M EVO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $235
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback