MSI Z270 GAMING M5 (MS-7A78)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics48.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive184% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMSI MS-7A78
MotherboardMSI Z270 GAMING M5 (MS-7A78)  (all builds)
Memory56.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170628
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 13 '18 at 09:28
Run Duration210 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$241
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 97
1-Core 149
2-Core 297
100% 181 Pts
4-Core 577
8-Core 841
89% 709 Pts
64-Core 837
52% 837 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 102%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing below potential (47th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
48.3% Average
Lighting 57.7
Reflection 67.7
Parallax 60.5
47% 62 fps
MRender 72.1
Gravity 61.3
Splatting 55.5
51% 63 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
89GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
85GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
184% Outstanding
Read 1,846
Write 1,195
Mixed 1,301
320% 1,447 MB/s
4K Read 36.9
4K Write 52.9
4K Mixed 23.2
114% 37.7 MB/s
DQ Read 70.5
DQ Write 92.7
DQ Mixed 14.9
30% 59.3 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 184%
Great: 236%
Intel 600p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$49
82GB free
Firmware: PSF109C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 1,387
Write 555
Mixed 794
200% 912 MB/s
4K Read 24.3
4K Write 53.8
4K Mixed 13.9
83% 30.7 MB/s
DQ Read 21.8
DQ Write 94
DQ Mixed 13.7
23% 43.2 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 116%
Great: 157%
WD Black 4TB (2013)-$178
3TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
86.6% Excellent
Read 157
Write 144
Mixed 140
111% 147 MB/s
4K Read 0.94
4K Write 2.85
4K Mixed 0.35
131% 1.38 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 86.6%
Great: 98%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 4TB-$230
2TB free
Firmware: CC44 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
71.4% Very good
Read 102
Write 145
Mixed 117
92% 122 MB/s
4K Read 0.66
4K Write 5.26
4K Mixed 0.4
169% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 71.4%
Great: 94%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
1TB free
Firmware: CC27 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 192
Write 172
Mixed 165
132% 176 MB/s
4K Read 0.78
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.31
94% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 105%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-3200C15-16GVK 04CD F4-3200C14-16GTZKY 04CD F4-3200C15-16GVK 04CD F4-3200C14-16GTZKY 64GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
100% Outstanding
MC Read 34.8
MC Write 38.3
MC Mixed 31.2
99% 34.8 GB/s
SC Read 23.5
SC Write 44.1
SC Mixed 32.7
96% 33.4 GB/s
Latency 50.3
80% 50.3 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 100%
Great: 100%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z270 GAMING M5 (MS-7A78) Builds (Compare 1,900 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: MSI Z270 GAMING M5 (MS-7A78) - $500

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $1,293
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback