Gigabyte GA-B450 I AORUS PRO WIFI-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics71.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive300% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte B450 I AORUS PRO WIFI
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B450 I AORUS PRO WIFI-CF  (all builds)
Memory20.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201029
Uptime9.7 Days
Run DateMay 04 '24 at 00:32
Run Duration230 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$78
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
85.4% Excellent
Memory 70.5
1-Core 141
2-Core 279
87% 163 Pts
4-Core 538
8-Core 838
85% 688 Pts
64-Core 1,092
68% 1,092 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 85.4%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 552.12
Performing below potential (52nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
71.3% Very good
Lighting 88.6
Reflection 87
Parallax 81.9
72% 85.8 fps
MRender 114
Gravity 78.7
Splatting 70.1
70% 87.5 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$147
237GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1489 1179 1138 1053 1085 1126 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
300% Outstanding
Read 2,560
Write 2259
Mixed 1582
SusWrite 1,178
424% 1,895 MB/s
4K Read 62.8
4K Write 152
4K Mixed 84.4
284% 99.7 MB/s
DQ Read 909
DQ Write 791
DQ Mixed 832
629% 844 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 300%
Great: 372%
Samsung Spinpoint T166 500GB-$40
186GB free
Firmware: CR100-13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 51 55 53 53 53 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
32.3% Below average
Read 59.3
Write 67
Mixed 43.7
SusWrite 53.1
41% 55.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
142% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 32.3%
Great: 44%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$18
235GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 116 120 122 120 121 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
75.1% Very good
Read 141
Write 136
Mixed 72
SusWrite 120
86% 117 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.2
238% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 109%
WD 10EADS External 1TB
108GB free, PID 1003
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 41 41 41 41 41 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
19.7% Very poor
Read 50.4
Write 39.5
Mixed 30.8
SusWrite 40.7
53% 40.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
57% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 19.7%
Great: 21%
WD My Passport 260D 4TB
1.5TB free, PID 260d
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 85 85 84 85 84 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
47% Average
Read 76.9
Write 79.9
Mixed 59
SusWrite 84.4
102% 75.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 5.6
4K Mixed 0.8
221% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 47%
Great: 64%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$102
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
66.9% Good
MC Read 28.2
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 25.7
69% 24 GB/s
SC Read 19.7
SC Write 18.1
SC Mixed 23.9
59% 20.6 GB/s
Latency 99.8
40% 99.8 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 34.1" 1280 720 GSM76F9 LG ULTRAWIDE
Typical GA-B450 I AORUS PRO WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 2,611 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 109%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B450 I AORUS PRO WIFI-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $551
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-13600K $232Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $378WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback