Acer Predator G5910

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.1%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
SystemAcer Predator G5910  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Predator G5910
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111222
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 13 '18 at 08:16
Run Duration258 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i7-2600-$350
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
59.1% Above average
SC Int 95.6
SC Float 96.3
SC Mixed 92.4
76% 94.8 Pts
QC Int 290
QC Float 273
QC Mixed 271
63% 278 Pts
MC Int 428
MC Float 467
MC Mixed 461
68% 452 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 72%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$90
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
56.8% Above average
Read 106
Write 92
Mixed 78.1
69% 92.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.14
4K Write 1.19
4K Mixed 0.07
36% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 66%
USB DISK 2.0 8GB
3GB free, PID 3e00
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
4.58% Terrible
Read 17.1
Write 4.18
Mixed 8.34
10% 9.89 MB/s
4K Read 4.93
4K Write 0.007
4K Mixed 0.008
19% 1.65 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.58%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 Micron 16JTF1G64AZ-1G6E1 M378B5273DH0-CH9 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
26% Poor
MC Read 8.1
MC Write 7.6
MC Mixed 7.3
22% 7.67 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 7.8
SC Mixed 9
24% 8.43 GB/s
Latency 63.5
63% 63.5 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 26%
Great: 42%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Predator G5910 Builds (Compare 219 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski

System: Acer Predator G5910

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $599
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $66Nvidia GTX 1070 $350Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $100
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $155Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $249Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $98
Intel Core i7-7700K $355AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $160
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $869SanDisk Extreme 64GB $42
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $140SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $60Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $157SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback