Asus 1215N

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	23.7% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago.

System	Asus 1215N (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK 1215N
Memory	2.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores,
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20110505
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 19 '16 at 21:14
Run Duration	330 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	17%

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Atom D525-$250 2,196 User benchmarks, average bench 23% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	33.1% Below average	Memory 60.9 1-Core 10.5 2-Core 19.2 25% 30.2 Pts	4-Core 34.5 8-Core 34 5% 34.2 Pts	64-Core 32.9 2% 32.9 Pts
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 33.1% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ Trion 100 240GB-$95 9,561 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 177GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFM Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 94 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 34 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (A9) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 200 200 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 5 (C2) HDA temperature 60 50 214749282344	23.7% Poor	Read 223 Write 90.5 Mixed 124 32% 146 MB/s	4K Read 7.93 4K Write 5.37 4K Mixed 3.59 19% 5.63 MB/s	DQ Read 109 DQ Write 52 DQ Mixed 27.5 34% 62.8 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 23.7% Great: 83%
Kingston DataTraveler Ultimate USB 3.0 64GB 34 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 4GB free, PID 1656 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	11.3% Very poor	Read 39.8 Write 21.4 Mixed 16.7 29% 26 MB/s	4K Read 3.35 4K Write 0.005 4K Mixed 0.006 13% 1.12 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 11.3% Great: 38%
Multiple Card Reader 8GB 1,430 User benchmarks, average bench 8% 4GB free, PID 6366 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	7.39% Terrible	Read 18.9 Write 9.13 Mixed 9.33 14% 12.4 MB/s	4K Read 4.32 4K Write 0.54 4K Mixed 0.47 50% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 7.39% Great: 14%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x4GB 154,807 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 800 MHz Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	15.2% Very poor	MC Read 5.4 MC Write 4.5 MC Mixed 4.5 14% 4.8 GB/s	SC Read 2.8 SC Write 5 SC Mixed 5 12% 4.27 GB/s	Latency 125 32% 125 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 15.2% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 1215N Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 23%

Surfboard

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Asus 1215N

CPU
Atom D525Intel $250Bench 23%, 2,196 samples	5x

GPU
IONNvidiaBench 1%, 1,623 samples	5x

SSD
PH6-CE240-L1 240GBBench 69%, 312 samples	1x
840 Evo 250GBSamsung $95Bench 96%, 217,115 samples	1x
256GB 256GBSSDBench 77%, 9,229 samples	1x

RAM
4GBUnknownBench 26%, 42,830 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 24% - Poor

Total price: $250

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16