MSI A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 194%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 174%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 105%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics190% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive41% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C51
MotherboardMSI A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51)  (all builds)
Memory23.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220516
Uptime6.8 Days
Run DateMar 25 '24 at 20:18
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600-$129
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Memory 90.1
1-Core 162
2-Core 321
103% 191 Pts
4-Core 640
8-Core 949
99% 794 Pts
64-Core 1,088
67% 1,088 Pts
Poor: 84%
This bench: 105%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-$520
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 551.23
Performing below potential (49th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
190% Outstanding
Lighting 267
Reflection 255
Parallax 267
218% 263 fps
MRender 350
Gravity 235
Splatting 188
202% 258 fps
Poor: 162%
This bench: 190%
Great: 205%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$55
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF400400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 60 41 26 13 19 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
41% Average
Read 446
Write 387
Mixed 163
SusWrite 55.4
58% 263 MB/s
4K Read 16.3
4K Write 40.6
4K Mixed 11.1
60% 22.7 MB/s
DQ Read 31.5
DQ Write 55.4
DQ Mixed 35.1
29% 40.7 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 41%
Great: 55%
Fanxiang S101 1TB
824GB free
Firmware: SN14941
SusWrite @10s intervals: 438 424 419 428 439 445 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
95.6% Outstanding
Read 422
Write 395
Mixed 422
SusWrite 432
94% 418 MB/s
4K Read 33.9
4K Write 87.6
4K Mixed 29.1
135% 50.2 MB/s
DQ Read 244
DQ Write 296
DQ Mixed 296
216% 279 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 95.6%
Great: 107%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39
120GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 153 152 148 98 97 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
88.4% Excellent
Read 175
Write 168
Mixed 74.9
SusWrite 134
100% 138 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
158% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW32GX4M2E3200C16 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
89.6% Excellent
MC Read 38.4
MC Write 23.6
MC Mixed 33.3
91% 31.8 GB/s
SC Read 30
SC Write 23.3
SC Mixed 33.6
83% 29 GB/s
Latency 71.6
56% 71.6 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 89.6%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 59 144 24.5" 1280 720 BNQ7F7D BenQ EX2510
Typical A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51) Builds (Compare 3,915 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: MSI A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $295
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $423
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback