MSI B350M MORTAR (MS-7A37)

Performance Results


Gaming 23% Surfboard	Desktop 70% Battleship	Workstation 22% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	31.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	67.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	MSI MS-7A37
Motherboard	MSI B350M MORTAR (MS-7A37) (all builds)
Memory	12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170428
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 11 '18 at 15:55
Run Duration	511 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	11%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110 392,253 User benchmarks, average bench 70% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	63.3% Good	Memory 67 1-Core 101 2-Core 179 65% 116 Pts	4-Core 321 8-Core 622 56% 471 Pts	64-Core 844 52% 844 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 63.3% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Gigabyte(1458 3763) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.71 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	31.6% Below average	Lighting 39.7 Reflection 30.8 Parallax 37.2 32% 35.9 fps	MRender 38.3 Gravity 37.5 Splatting 35.4 30% 37.1 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 31.6% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
240gb SSD 240GB 2,356 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 151GB free (System drive) Firmware: V2.10 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 625 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 88 (A1) Unknown 100 100 0 (A4) Unknown 100 100 14841 (A5) Unknown 100 100 9 (A6) Unknown 100 100 4 (A7) Unknown 100 100 7 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 48 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 727 (F2) Unknown 100 100 703 (F3) Unknown 100 100 0 (F4) Unknown 100 100 0 (FA) Read error retry rate 100 100 0 (FB) Unknown 100 100 0 (FC) Unknown 100 100 0 (FD) Unknown 100 100 0 (FE) Unknown 100 100 0	67.4% Good	Read 493 Write 381 Mixed 428 97% 434 MB/s	4K Read 22.8 4K Write 55.4 4K Mixed 3.02 68% 27.1 MB/s	DQ Read 112 DQ Write 157 DQ Mixed 3.7 40% 91.2 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 67.4% Great: 93%
WD Blue 750GB (2008)-$72 4,659 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 522GB free Firmware: 30.04G30 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 202 180 6883 (04) Start/Stop count 89 89 11574 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 60 60 29372 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4080 (C0) Power-off retract count 199 199 1045 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 197 197 11585 (C2) HDA temperature 105 88 47 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 70673 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	45.8% Average	Read 80.7 Write 78.9 Mixed 86.6 62% 82.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.46 4K Write 1.63 4K Mixed 0.3 83% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 45.8% Great: 52%
JetFlash Transcend 32GB 11,405 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 5GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	8.21% Terrible	Read 35.1 Write 13.5 Mixed 21.6 27% 23.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.06 4K Write 0.05 4K Mixed 0.06 4% 0.06 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 8.21% Great: 58%
JetFlash Transcend 2GB 533 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 2GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	5.17% Terrible	Read 18.3 Write 6.56 Mixed 6.05 11% 10.3 MB/s	4K Read 4.4 4K Write 0.02 4K Mixed 0.01 17% 1.48 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.17% Great: 7%
USB DISK 2.0 4GB 667 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 1GB free, PID 4200 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 10.7 Write 2.66 Mixed 3.75 6% 5.7 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX 2133 C14 1x16GB 5,915 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz Performing below potential (29^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	37% Below average	MC Read 13.6 MC Write 11.8 MC Mixed 11.4 35% 12.3 GB/s	SC Read 14.1 SC Write 13.4 SC Mixed 14.2 40% 13.9 GB/s	Latency 109 37% 109 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 37% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical B350M MORTAR (MS-7A37) Builds (Compare 729 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 46%

Yacht

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 42%

Speed boat

Motherboard: MSI B350M MORTAR (MS-7A37)

CPU
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	183x
Ryzen 5 1600XAMD $125Bench 74%, 140,440 samples	77x
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	58x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	79x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	47x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	46x

SSD
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	24x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	24x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	16x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	32x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	19x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 98% - Outstanding

Total price: $319

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16