Asus E200HA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 26%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.46% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive23.2% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemAsus E200HA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK E200HA
Memory2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160601
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 10 '18 at 21:43
Run Duration236 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Atom x5-Z8350
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.45 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
26.5% Poor
Memory 42.1
1-Core 18.7
2-Core 37.8
23% 32.9 Pts
4-Core 65.2
8-Core 65.1
9% 65.1 Pts
64-Core 67.2
4% 67.2 Pts
Poor: 9%
This bench: 26.5%
Great: 28%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics
Asus(1043 10B0) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4364
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.46% Terrible
Lighting 1.47
Reflection 2.5
Parallax 2.06
1% 2.01 fps
MRender 2.48
Gravity 1.4
Splatting 3.13
2% 2.34 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.46%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hynix HBG4a2 31GB
4GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 10.4
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
23.2% Poor
Read 116
Write 89.2
Mixed 96.9
22% 101 MB/s
4K Read 18.9
4K Write 17.1
4K Mixed 3.21
42% 13.1 MB/s
DQ Read 38.6
DQ Write 30.8
DQ Mixed 2.9
11% 24.1 MB/s
Generic SU08G SD Card 8GB
0GB free
Firmware: 8.0
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
8.72% Terrible
Read 21.3
Write 7.64
Mixed 11.1
10% 13.3 MB/s
4K Read 4.56
4K Write 0.02
4K Mixed 0.02
193% 1.54 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 8.72%
Great: 12%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
21% Poor
MC Read 7.9
MC Write 8.8
MC Mixed 6.9
22% 7.87 GB/s
SC Read 3
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 2.6
10% 3.53 GB/s
Latency 193
21% 193 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 21%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback