MSI MAG Z790 TOMAHAWK MAX WIFI (MS-7E25)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 507%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 127%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 637%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 131%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics408% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive566% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7E25
MotherboardMSI MAG Z790 TOMAHAWK MAX WIFI (MS-7E25)  (all builds)
Memory23.8 GB free of 32 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240118
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 01 '24 at 15:42
Run Duration271 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-14700K-$398
U3E1, 1 CPU, 20 cores, 28 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 5.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
131% Outstanding
Memory 90.8
1-Core 228
2-Core 457
134% 259 Pts
4-Core 913
8-Core 1,729
157% 1321 Pts
64-Core 3,753
232% 3,753 Pts
Poor: 125%
This bench: 131%
Great: 134%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,764
Nvidia(10DE 16F4) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 551.61
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
408% Outstanding
Lighting 663
Reflection 590
Parallax 730
540% 661 fps
MRender 544
Gravity 577
Splatting 314
375% 478 fps
Poor: 303%
This bench: 408%
Great: 407%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB-$119
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 620331WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4911 4932 2931 1718 1910 1705 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
566% Outstanding
Read 4,356
Write 4,670
Mixed 3,225
SusWrite 3,018
858% 3,817 MB/s
4K Read 82.6
4K Write 280
4K Mixed 110
414% 158 MB/s
DQ Read 2,001
DQ Write 1,649
DQ Mixed 1,844
1,376% 1,831 MB/s
Poor: 293%
This bench: 566%
Great: 666%
WDS200T1X0E-00AFY0 2TB
211GB free
Firmware: 614600WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2809 656 664 675 651 661 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
387% Outstanding
Read 3,395
Write 3,539
Mixed 2,800
SusWrite 1,019
603% 2,688 MB/s
4K Read 54.7
4K Write 256
4K Mixed 94.5
339% 135 MB/s
DQ Read 2,220
DQ Write 1,563
DQ Mixed 1,876
1,405% 1,886 MB/s
Poor: 280%
This bench: 387%
Great: 578%
Seagate FireCuda 520 SSD ZP1000GM30002 1TB
373GB free
Firmware: STNSC014
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3453 2171 574 233 59 398 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
317% Outstanding
Read 1,786
Write 3,208
Mixed 1,999
SusWrite 1,148
461% 2,035 MB/s
4K Read 40.4
4K Write 265
4K Mixed 91.5
319% 132 MB/s
DQ Read 1,937
DQ Write 1,512
DQ Mixed 1,899
1,373% 1,782 MB/s
Poor: 177%
This bench: 317%
Great: 492%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL TZ/RJ/FX DDR5 7200 C34 2x16GB-$130
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 7200 MHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
217% Outstanding
MC Read 95.2
MC Write 83.8
MC Mixed 81.5
248% 86.8 GB/s
SC Read 23.2
SC Write 52.4
SC Mixed 33.9
104% 36.5 GB/s
Latency 66.2
60% 66.2 ns
Poor: 140%
This bench: 217%
Great: 255%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 22 1 60 23" 1920 1009 HWP3279 HP E232
Typical MAG Z790 TOMAHAWK MAX WIFI (MS-7E25) Builds (Compare 632 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 459%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 127%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 609%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG Z790 TOMAHAWK MAX WIFI (MS-7E25)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $2,671
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $119
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $423
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback