Asrock 990FX Killer

Performance Results


Gaming 16% Surfboard	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	20.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	63.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Motherboard	Asrock 990FX Killer (all builds)
Memory	12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20160106
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 10 '18 at 20:48
Run Duration	222 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing as expected (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8350-$130 313,196 User benchmarks, average bench 61% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.8 GHz Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	63.5% Good	Memory 72.1 1-Core 83.9 2-Core 163 62% 106 Pts	4-Core 296 8-Core 506 49% 401 Pts	64-Core 521 32% 521 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 63.5% Great: 68%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia GTX 480-$500 3,874 User benchmarks, average bench 20% Nvidia(10DE 075F) 1.5GB CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 924 MHz, Ram: 1.5GB, Driver: 388.31 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	20.6% Poor	Lighting 23.8 Reflection 36 Parallax 26.4 19% 28.7 fps	MRender 39 Gravity 19.4 Splatting 27.2 23% 28.5 fps
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 20.6% Great: 22%
Nvidia GTX 960-$198 440,282 User benchmarks, average bench 33% Gainward(10B0 1401) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.31 Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 30% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Z400s 256GB-$221 10,770 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 100GB free Firmware: Z2333000 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 36 100 36 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1515 (A6) Unknown 100 100 3 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 5 (A9) Unknown 100 100 198 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 4 (AE) Unknown 100 100 603 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 55 100 231928234029 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 518 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 16 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 644 (F1) Unknown 253 253 634 (F2) Unknown 253 253 534	55.7% Above average	Read 375 Write 295 Mixed 234 67% 301 MB/s	4K Read 24.5 4K Write 63.8 4K Mixed 2.56 74% 30.3 MB/s	DQ Read 25.4 DQ Write 90.4 DQ Mixed 3.66 18% 39.8 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 55.7% Great: 84%
SanDisk SSD Plus 120GB-$42 87,912 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 23GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z220 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 130 100 1154 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2390 (A6) Unknown 100 100 4349 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 4401 (A9) Unknown 100 100 37 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 4363 (AE) Unknown 100 100 774 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 59 100 206158430249 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 21 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 146 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 413033 (F1) Unknown 253 253 16642 (F2) Unknown 253 253 15658	63.7% Good	Read 476 Write 203 Mixed 282 70% 320 MB/s	4K Read 26.5 4K Write 83.6 4K Mixed 3.99 90% 38.1 MB/s	DQ Read 157 DQ Write 197 DQ Mixed 19 58% 124 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 63.7% Great: 78%
WD WD1000FYPS-01ZKB0 1TB 1,867 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 506GB free Firmware: 02.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 187 11 7625 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4036 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 93 93 5192 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1412 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 477 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 181 181 57690 (C2) HDA temperature 120 109 32 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	25.7% Poor	Read 44.8 Write 44.3 Mixed 46.1 34% 45.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.54 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.27 89% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 25.7% Great: 44%
WD WD1000FYPS-01ZKB0 1TB 1,867 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 270GB free Firmware: 02.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 178 32 8091 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3776 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 93 93 5202 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1437 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 514 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 187 187 39586 (C2) HDA temperature 119 108 33 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	27.5% Poor	Read 51.6 Write 43.5 Mixed 46.5 36% 47.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.64 4K Write 2.25 4K Mixed 0.3 102% 1.06 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 27.5% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CL11-13-13 D3-2400 4x4GB 70 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 800 MHz clocked @ 400 MHz Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	29.3% Poor	MC Read 10.7 MC Write 10 MC Mixed 9.3 29% 10 GB/s	SC Read 7.5 SC Write 7.5 SC Mixed 8 22% 7.67 GB/s	Latency 96.6 41% 96.6 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 29.3% Great: 87%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 990FX Killer Builds (Compare 257 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 36%

Jet ski

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 29%

Raft

Motherboard: Asrock 990FX Killer - $154

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	138x
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	29x
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	19x

GPU
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	22x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	18x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	12x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	9x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	7x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	6x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	10x
BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 2x8GBCrucialBench 55%, 48,796 samples	5x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 71% - Very good

Total price: $494

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16