Asus AM1M-A

Performance Results


Gaming 15% Surfboard	Desktop 51% Yacht	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	30.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	36.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus AM1M-A (all builds)
Memory	6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160401
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 10 '18 at 04:44
Run Duration	242 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon 5370 APU R3 159 User benchmarks, average bench 38% FS1b , 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	42.4% Average	Memory 60.4 1-Core 36.2 2-Core 72.4 37% 56.3 Pts	4-Core 144 8-Core 141 19% 142 Pts	64-Core 143 9% 143 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 42.4% Great: 43%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101 269,381 User benchmarks, average bench 26% EVGA(3842 6157) 2GB CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	30.2% Below average	Lighting 37.7 Reflection 25.5 Parallax 28.6 31% 30.6 fps	MRender 37.5 Gravity 35.1 Splatting 34.4 29% 35.7 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 30.2% Great: 28%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 480GB-$40 16,752 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 422GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z32080RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 0 100 92 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 67 (A5) Unknown 100 100 167509753945 (A6) Unknown 100 100 3 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 4 (A9) Unknown 100 100 0 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 3 (AE) Unknown 100 100 31 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 57 44 240518168619 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 124557262897 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 1176 (EA) Unknown 100 100 1652 (F1) Unknown 253 253 1353 (F2) Unknown 253 253 860 (F4) Unknown 0 100 0	36.1% Below average	Read 421 Write 78.1 Mixed 299 58% 266 MB/s	4K Read 18.1 4K Write 40.5 4K Mixed 0.04 49% 19.5 MB/s	DQ Read 20 DQ Write 48.5 DQ Mixed 0.04 10% 22.8 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 36.1% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C9 2x4GB 7,948 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	20.8% Poor	MC Read 8.6 MC Write 5.1 MC Mixed 7.3 20% 7 GB/s	SC Read 5.3 SC Write 4.6 SC Mixed 7 16% 5.63 GB/s	Latency 126 32% 126 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 20.8% Great: 70%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical AM1M-A Builds (Compare 64 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 33%

Sail boat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus AM1M-A - $44

CPU
Athlon 5350 APU R3AMDBench 34%, 3,720 samples	34x
Athlon 5150 APU R3AMDBench 32%, 1,478 samples	17x
Sempron 2650 APU R3AMDBench 25%, 658 samples	7x

GPU
Radeon HD 8400-R3AMDBench 2%, 11,968 samples	26x
HD 8240AMDBench 1%, 3,521 samples	6x
GTX 560 TiNvidia $188Bench 16%, 42,397 samples	2x

SSD
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	4x
SD8SN8U-512G-1006 512GBSandiskBench 75%, 1,494 samples	3x
Solid State Disk 128GBSpccBench 69%, 14,793 samples	3x

RAM
KHX1600C10D3/8G KHX1600C10D3/4G 8GBKingstonBench 49%, 1,528 samples	2x
CT51264BA160BJ.C8 1x4GBCrucialBench 27%, 1,234 samples	2x
BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. 8GBUnknownBench 38%, 2,343 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 8% - Terrible

Total price: $82

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16