Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS ELITE WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 186%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 186%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics195% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive252% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X570 AORUS ELITE WIFI  (all builds)
Memory21 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231225
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 13 '24 at 05:07
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D-$450
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
97% Outstanding
Memory 84.6
1-Core 161
2-Core 310
100% 185 Pts
4-Core 586
8-Core 1,019
97% 802 Pts
64-Core 1,459
90% 1,459 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 97%
Great: 111%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6950-XT
PowerColor(148C 2420) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 24.1.1
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
195% Outstanding
Lighting 245
Reflection 248
Parallax 500
200% 331 fps
MRender 393
Gravity 207
Splatting 329
254% 309 fps
Poor: 183%
This bench: 195%
Great: 214%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$63
467GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 42A4SANA Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1162 849 603 506 1124 946 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
252% Outstanding
Read 2,282
Write 870
Mixed 225
SusWrite 865
232% 1,061 MB/s
4K Read 45
4K Write 92.5
4K Mixed 57.1
190% 64.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,262
DQ Write 927
DQ Mixed 527
548% 905 MB/s
Poor: 175%
This bench: 252%
Great: 372%
Samsung 870 EVO 2TB-$185
664GB free
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 409 415 423 432 436 443 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
94.6% Outstanding
Read 480
Write 420
Mixed 361
SusWrite 426
95% 422 MB/s
4K Read 28.9
4K Write 67.7
4K Mixed 36.9
127% 44.5 MB/s
DQ Read 251
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 203
157% 217 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 94.6%
Great: 136%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
313GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 408 414 422 432 435 327 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
98.3% Outstanding
Read 477
Write 421
Mixed 398
SusWrite 406
96% 426 MB/s
4K Read 33.3
4K Write 68.8
4K Mixed 43.2
142% 48.4 MB/s
DQ Read 251
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 219
165% 222 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 98.3%
Great: 129%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$69
380GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 80 79 81 81 80 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
57.5% Above average
Read 120
Write 84.6
Mixed 85.3
SusWrite 80
69% 92.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
172% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 84%
Seagate IronWolf 4TB (2016)-$95
2TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 130 107 137 151 147 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
77.5% Very good
Read 137
Write 145
Mixed 66
SusWrite 133
88% 120 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
155% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
120% Outstanding
MC Read 63
MC Write 26.6
MC Mixed 42.7
126% 44.1 GB/s
SC Read 30.8
SC Write 25.8
SC Mixed 39.7
92% 32.1 GB/s
Latency 59.3
68% 59.3 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 120%
Great: 133%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 66 53 144 27" 1280 720 GSM5B7F 27GL850
Typical GA-X570 AORUS ELITE WIFI Builds (Compare 6,845 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 182%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 182%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS ELITE WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $730
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback