Performance Results

Gaming 524%
Desktop 129%
Workstation 694%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (94th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 6 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 134%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics412% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive476% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7D89
MotherboardMSI MPG Z790 CARBON WIFI (MS-7D89)  (all builds)
Memory19.4 GB free of 32 GB
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240130
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 13 '24 at 00:55
Run Duration290 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-13900KS-$570
U3E1, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 5.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
134% Outstanding
Memory 93.9
1-Core 231
2-Core 466
136% 264 Pts
4-Core 931
8-Core 1,809
162% 1,370 Pts
64-Core 4,390
272% 4,390 Pts
Poor: 123%
This bench: 134%
Great: 138%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,500
CLim: 3165 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 551.46
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
412% Outstanding
Lighting 669
Reflection 604
Parallax 740
545% 671 fps
MRender 556
Gravity 588
Splatting 312
380% 485 fps
Poor: 303%
This bench: 412%
Great: 407%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$105
557GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3036 2254 1825 1853 1843 1851 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
476% Outstanding
Read 2,930
Write 3,404
Mixed 3142
SusWrite 2,110
654% 2,896 MB/s
4K Read 88.9
4K Write 271
4K Mixed 133
449% 164 MB/s
DQ Read 2,194
DQ Write 1,866
DQ Mixed 2,030
1,521% 2,030 MB/s
Poor: 266%
This bench: 476%
Great: 477%
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$100
786GB free
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 470 469 471 469 467 464 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
135% Outstanding
Read 514
Write 487
Mixed 449
SusWrite 468
108% 480 MB/s
4K Read 47.2
4K Write 126
4K Mixed 67
224% 80 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 322
DQ Mixed 256
217% 317 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 135%
Great: 137%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$170
993GB free
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3118 3120 3093 3096 3095 3190 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
534% Outstanding
Read 2,918
Write 3,362
Mixed 3,062
SusWrite 3,119
705% 3,115 MB/s
4K Read 83
4K Write 240
4K Mixed 126
415% 150 MB/s
DQ Read 2,340
DQ Write 2,071
DQ Mixed 2192
1,647% 2,201 MB/s
Poor: 278%
This bench: 534%
Great: 508%
2.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 190 198 194 194 192 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 76% Great: 136%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMT32GX5M2X7200C34 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 7200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
246% Outstanding
MC Read 101
MC Write 99
MC Mixed 94.6
280% 98.1 GB/s
SC Read 31
SC Write 52.9
SC Mixed 42
120% 42 GB/s
Latency 55.6
72% 55.6 ns
Poor: 140%
This bench: 246%
Great: 248%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 66 54 144 38" 1280 720 AUS38EA PG38UQ
Typical MPG Z790 CARBON WIFI (MS-7D89) Builds (Compare 2,261 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 453%
Desktop 125%
Workstation 596%

Motherboard: MSI MPG Z790 CARBON WIFI (MS-7D89)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $2,228
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $380
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback