Performance Results


Gaming 62% Destroyer	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 51% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	85.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	115% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

System	HP Z220 CMT Workstation (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 1790
Memory	21.4 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20161021
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 09 '18 at 18:26
Run Duration	122 Seconds
Run User	IRL-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1240 V2-$345 4,997 User benchmarks, average bench 71% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	70.1% Very good	Memory 80.9 1-Core 98.7 2-Core 199 72% 126 Pts	4-Core 322 8-Core 451 49% 386 Pts	64-Core 499 31% 499 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 70.1% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Asus(1043 85A0) CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 390.65 Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	85.7% Excellent	Lighting 107 Reflection 118 Parallax 99.6 87% 108 fps	MRender 99.5 Gravity 99.1 Splatting 103 82% 100 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 85.7% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 3TB 679 User benchmarks, average bench 255% 1.5TB free Firmware: 1.0. Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	39.4% Below average	Read 393 Write 334 Mixed 308 77% 345 MB/s	4K Read 2.1 4K Write 10 4K Mixed 1.22 10% 4.46 MB/s	DQ Read 8.87 DQ Write 9.86 DQ Mixed 2.5 4% 7.08 MB/s
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 39.4% Great: 462%
Samsung MZNTY256HDHP-00000 256GB 2,168 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 191GB free (System drive) Firmware: MAT2100Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 10 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 49 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 99 99 2 (AE) Unknown 99 99 6 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 1873 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 63 25 37 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 99 99 16735271 (F1) Unknown 99 99 343 (F2) Unknown 99 99 101 (F9) Unknown 99 99 512	115% Outstanding	Read 521 Write 499 Mixed 502 113% 507 MB/s	4K Read 42.2 4K Write 110 4K Mixed 30.3 161% 60.9 MB/s	DQ Read 382 DQ Write 354 DQ Mixed 114 155% 283 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 115% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT51264BD160B.C16F 859B CT102464BD160B.C16 Micron 16JTF51264AZ-1G6M1 859B CT102464BD160B.C16 24GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	53.3% Above average	MC Read 19.9 MC Write 18.8 MC Mixed 16.4 52% 18.4 GB/s	SC Read 16 SC Write 17.7 SC Mixed 17.1 48% 16.9 GB/s	Latency 78.9 51% 78.9 ns
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 53.3% Great: 53%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 25%

Surfboard

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 21%

Surfboard

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	101x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	71x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	71x

RAM
M378B5273DH0-CK0 4x4GBSamsungBench 57%, 2,354 samples	33x
16JTF51264AZ-1G6M1 4x4GBMicronBench 55%, 1,512 samples	25x
HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 4x4GBHynixBench 58%, 7,298 samples	25x

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $384

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16