Asrock 990FX Extreme9

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics15.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive79.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock 990FX Extreme9  (all builds)
Memory25.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160329
Uptime20.2 Days
Run DateJan 09 '18 at 13:10
Run Duration367 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-9590-$298
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.7 GHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
65.5% Good
Memory 83.2
1-Core 75.1
2-Core 148
62% 102 Pts
4-Core 259
8-Core 448
43% 353 Pts
64-Core 458
28% 458 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Gigabyte(1458 375D) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.59
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
15.7% Very poor
Lighting 19.5
Reflection 15.5
Parallax 18.3
16% 17.7 fps
MRender 15.8
Gravity 19.1
Splatting 20.6
15% 18.5 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 15.7%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 750GB-$310
93GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
79.2% Very good
Read 467
Write 309
Mixed 333
82% 370 MB/s
4K Read 34.4
4K Write 54.5
4K Mixed 24.3
112% 37.7 MB/s
DQ Read 214
DQ Write 150
DQ Mixed 55.1
76% 140 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 125%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
369GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
59.4% Above average
Read 113
Write 94.2
Mixed 6.2
51% 71.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.57
4K Write 1.62
4K Mixed 0.2
76% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 83%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
330GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
59.6% Above average
Read 120
Write 87.6
Mixed 4.74
51% 70.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.46
4K Write 1.63
4K Mixed 0.19
70% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 83%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$95
295GB free
Firmware: CC32 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
48.9% Average
Read 87
Write 83.5
Mixed 82.7
64% 84.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.29
4K Write 0.72
4K Mixed 0.38
68% 0.46 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 75%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$95
283GB free
Firmware: CC32 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
45.5% Average
Read 74.1
Write 84.7
Mixed 78.6
60% 79.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.66
4K Write 0.71
4K Mixed 0.55
102% 0.64 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 45.5%
Great: 75%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$136
282GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
68.8% Good
Read 114
Write 126
Mixed 92.7
83% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.63
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.29
84% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 87%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
187GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
45.4% Average
Read 94.1
Write 63.9
Mixed 13.9
42% 57.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.64
4K Write 1.36
4K Mixed 0.16
70% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 45.4%
Great: 67%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
141GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
55.3% Above average
Read 95.2
Write 97.9
Mixed 50.5
60% 81.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.31
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.15
50% 0.52 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 67%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
119GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
41.7% Average
Read 66.7
Write 78.6
Mixed 64.8
53% 70 MB/s
4K Read 0.24
4K Write 1.79
4K Mixed 0.14
59% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 67%
H/W RAID 0 (Spanning) 16TB
202GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
42.8% Average
Read 76.6
Write 91.1
Mixed 80.9
109% 82.9 MB/s
4K Read 2.21
4K Write 3.7
4K Mixed 0.16
139% 2.02 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C10 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
42.6% Average
MC Read 16
MC Write 14.8
MC Mixed 14.7
43% 15.2 GB/s
SC Read 8.4
SC Write 8.2
SC Mixed 11.4
27% 9.33 GB/s
Latency 74.9
53% 74.9 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 990FX Extreme9 Builds (Compare 104 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock 990FX Extreme9 - $218

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $657
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $46
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback