Asus Zenbook UM5401QAB_UM5401QA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics19.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive175% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus Zenbook UM5401QAB_UM5401QA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK UM5401QAB
Memory5.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display2880 x 1800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211229
Uptime11.4 Days
Run DateJan 21 '24 at 20:13
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
91.2% Outstanding
Memory 70.2
1-Core 156
2-Core 307
94% 178 Pts
4-Core 601
8-Core 954
96% 777 Pts
64-Core 1,093
68% 1,093 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 91.2%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 5000 (iGPU)
Asus(1043 11CD) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.20.44.37
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
19.4% Very poor
Lighting 24.3
Reflection 19.6
Parallax 32.5
20% 25.5 fps
MRender 16.4
Gravity 28.5
Splatting 22.5
18% 22.5 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 19.4%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDPEKNU512GZ 512GB
201GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 514 177 84 89 142 86 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
175% Outstanding
Read 2,074
Write 1,569
Mixed 1,277
SusWrite 182
283% 1,275 MB/s
4K Read 50.4
4K Write 73.4
4K Mixed 56.8
188% 60.2 MB/s
DQ Read 453
DQ Write 569
DQ Mixed 359
313% 460 MB/s
Poor: 99%
This bench: 175%
Great: 290%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown H9HCNNNCPMMLXR-NEE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB LPDDR4 clocked @ 4266 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
84.5% Excellent
MC Read 32.7
MC Write 28.6
MC Mixed 28.5
86% 29.9 GB/s
SC Read 22.4
SC Write 38.8
SC Mixed 27.2
84% 29.5 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 84.5%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 90 14" 1280 720 SDC4154
Typical Zenbook UM5401QAB_UM5401QA Builds (Compare 36 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: Asus Zenbook UM5401QAB_UM5401QA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-13600K $232Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $378WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback