Fujitsu AMILO Li3910

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	22.6% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Fujitsu AMILO Li3910 (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU EF9
Memory	1.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display	1680 x 945 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20100111
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 08 '18 at 17:57
Run Duration	219 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	14%

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo T8100-$78 2,639 User benchmarks, average bench 35% U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.1 GHz Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	37.5% Below average	Memory 66 1-Core 29.5 2-Core 53.8 35% 49.8 Pts	4-Core 56.5 8-Core 51.2 7% 53.8 Pts	64-Core 56.4 4% 56.4 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 37.5% Great: 40%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel SSDSA2CT040G3 40GB 1,759 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 19GB free (System drive) Firmware: 4PC10362 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 3607 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2399 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 7 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 283 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 3 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 150226 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 2902 (E3) Torque amplification count 100 100 94 (E4) Power-off retract count 100 100 134434197 (E8) Unknown 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 98 98 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 150226 (F2) Unknown 100 100 166624	22.6% Poor	Read 171 Write 47.1 Mixed 69 21% 95.8 MB/s	4K Read 9.84 4K Write 20.8 4K Mixed 5.95 34% 12.2 MB/s	DQ Read 108 DQ Write 29.8 DQ Mixed 25.1 30% 54.2 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 22.6% Great: 37%
WDC WD50 00BEVT-22A0RT0 500GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 205GB free, PID 6116 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	12.4% Very poor	Read 29.8 Write 23 Mixed 24.4 32% 25.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.45 4K Write 0.96 4K Mixed 0.31 45% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12.4% Great: 17%
Generic- Multi-Card 64GB 369 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 40GB free, PID 0158 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	14.2% Very poor	Read 20.1 Write 17.5 Mixed 17.6 23% 18.4 MB/s	4K Read 3.65 4K Write 2.13 4K Mixed 0.77 112% 2.18 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 14.2% Great: 17%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR2 Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	9.91% Terrible	MC Read 2 MC Write 2.7 MC Mixed 2.6 7% 2.43 GB/s	SC Read 4.1 SC Write 3.9 SC Mixed 2.9 10% 3.63 GB/s	Latency 111 36% 111 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 9.91% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical AMILO Li3910 Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 34%

Sail boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu AMILO Li3910

CPU
Pentium T4300IntelBench 34%, 6,462 samples	1x
Pentium T4200Intel $99Bench 34%, 5,474 samples	1x
Pentium Dual T3200IntelBench 32%, 2,188 samples	1x

GPU
Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset FamilyIntelBench 0%, 23,924 samples	4x

SSD
840 250GBSamsung $251Bench 70%, 41,998 samples	1x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 4% - Terrible

Total price: $251

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16