Asus H81M-C

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD, HDD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.8%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.82% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 10 years and 1 month old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
19 months ago, 19 months ago.
MotherboardAsus H81M-C  (all builds)
Memory2.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140616
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 08 '18 at 13:49
Run Duration59 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i3-4150-$144
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
44.8% Average
1-Core 101
2-Core 193
70% 147 Pts
4-Core 267
8-Core 271
37% 269 Pts
64-Core 270
18% 270 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)
Asus(1043 8534) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 9.18.10.3186
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
2.82% Terrible
Lighting 10
Reflection 13.1
Parallax 11.5
3% 11.5 fps
MRender 9.5
Gravity 6.9
Splatting 16.4
3% 10.9 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.82%
Great: 3%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston 9905584-017.A00LF 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
32.9% Below average
MC Read 10.9
MC Write 10.7
MC Mixed 9.1
29% 10.2 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 11.2
SC Mixed 9.9
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 61.7
65% 61.7 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 32.9%
Great: 33%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds (explanation by AdoredTV).

Typical H81M-C Builds (Compare 3,848 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus H81M-C - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $325
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $143Nvidia GTX 1660 $220Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $86
Intel Core i5-9600K $219Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $270Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $102
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 $198AMD RX 580 $179Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $97
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $42G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $695SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback