Samsung 900X3C/900X3D/900X4C/900X4D

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 36% Jet ski	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	3.54% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	62.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

CPU throttled at 79% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Samsung 900X3C/900X3D/900X4C/900X4D (all builds)
Motherboard	SAMSUNG SAMSUNG_NP1234567890
Memory	3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20131118
Uptime	5.4 Days
Run Date	Jan 08 '18 at 12:40
Run Duration	100 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	0%
CPU Throttled	79%

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3517U 8,454 User benchmarks, average bench 51% CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	38.7% Below average	Memory 57.8 1-Core 20.1 2-Core 34.4 28% 37.4 Pts	4-Core 108 8-Core 191 18% 149 Pts	64-Core 190 12% 190 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 38.7% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) 409,110 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Sanyo(144D C0D3) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	3.54% Terrible	Lighting 3.83 Reflection 5.27 Parallax 2.91 3% 4 fps	MRender 5.24 Gravity 2.33 Splatting 7.48 4% 5.02 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.54% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 EVO mSATA 1TB 1,324 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 486GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT4 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 3809 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1498 (B1) Unknown 99 99 14 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 56 38 44 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 6 (EB) Unknown 99 99 61 (F1) Unknown 99 99 38359491264	62.9% Good	Read 492 Write 396 Mixed 423 97% 437 MB/s	4K Read 16.8 4K Write 15.3 4K Mixed 14 52% 15.4 MB/s	DQ Read 88.5 DQ Write 56.5 DQ Mixed 35.2 36% 60.1 MB/s
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 62.9% Great: 128%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata AM1U16BC4P2-B19C 2x4GB 1,385 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	44.7% Average	MC Read 15.1 MC Write 20.3 MC Mixed 17.9 51% 17.8 GB/s	SC Read 5.7 SC Write 4.4 SC Mixed 5.4 15% 5.17 GB/s	Latency 134 30% 134 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 44.7% Great: 58%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 900X3C/900X3D/900X4C/900X4D Builds (Compare 59 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 47%

Yacht

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

System: Samsung 900X3C/900X3D/900X4C/900X4D

CPU
Core i5-3317UIntel $225Bench 47%, 26,848 samples	35x
Core i7-3517UIntelBench 51%, 8,454 samples	23x
Core i5-2537MIntelBench 44%, 490 samples	1x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	58x
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	1x

SSD
U100 128GBSandiskBench 38%, 2,261 samples	18x
LMT-256M6M mSATA 256GBLiteonitBench 73%, 4,013 samples	10x
U100 SMG2 126GBSandiskBench 32%, 318 samples	8x

RAM
M471B5674BM0-CK0 2x2GBSamsungBench 44%, 279 samples	20x
AM1U16BC4P2-B19C 2x4GBAdataBench 52%, 1,385 samples	13x
M471B5273DH0-CK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 50%, 11,714 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 50% - Above average

Total price: $225

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16