Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 33% Sail boat	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (93rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 7 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	2.48% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	21.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N3450 6,637 User benchmarks, average bench 27% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	34.1% Below average	Memory 41 1-Core 43.6 2-Core 81.3 33% 55.3 Pts	4-Core 156 8-Core 166 21% 161 Pts	64-Core 164 10% 164 Pts
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 34.1% Great: 36%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 15,538 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Intel(8086 2212) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 22.20.16.4749 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	2.48% Terrible	Lighting 2.4 Reflection 3.15 Parallax 2.03 2% 2.53 fps	MRender 4.19 Gravity 2.23 Splatting 5.83 4% 4.08 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.48% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk SDW64G 63GB 193 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 15GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0.1 Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	21.8% Poor	Read 257 Write 65.2 Mixed 103 31% 142 MB/s	4K Read 8.33 4K Write 9.22 4K Mixed 3.46 22% 7 MB/s	DQ Read 38.8 DQ Write 15.3 DQ Mixed 3.26 9% 19.1 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 21.8% Great: 25%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
ABCD 123456789012345678 4x1.5GB 1,884 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 4 of 4 slots used 6GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	31.1% Below average	MC Read 10.5 MC Write 14.9 MC Mixed 11.7 35% 12.4 GB/s	SC Read 3.2 SC Write 4.5 SC Mixed 3.3 10% 3.67 GB/s	Latency 198 20% 198 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 31.1% Great: 29%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 28%

Raft

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron N3450IntelBench 27%, 6,637 samples	26x
Celeron N4020IntelBench 21%, 5,047 samples	10x
Celeron N4100IntelBench 33%, 6,492 samples	9x

GPU
HD Graphics 500IntelBench 1%, 7,914 samples	35x
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	20x
Iris Graphics 550IntelBench 8%, 819 samples	3x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16