| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 51% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 33.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asrock H61M-VG4 (all builds) |
| Memory | 13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20130712 |
| Uptime | 1.2 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 07 '18 at 18:44 |
| Run Duration | 120 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 14% |
PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
68%
Good
|
67% 113 Pts
|
43% 336 Pts
|
24% 384 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
EVGA(3842 2976) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.71
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
51%
Above average
|
52% 63.1 fps
|
48% 60.5 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
33.2%
Below average
|
46% 208 MB/s
|
34% 14.6 MB/s
|
12% 22.9 MB/s
|
|
|
111%
Outstanding
|
140% 187 MB/s
|
89% 0.91 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
M378B1G73AH0-K0 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
41%
Average
|
39% 13.6 GB/s
|
37% 13 GB/s
|
54% 73.8 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H61M-VG4 Builds (Compare 434 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock H61M-VG4
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 70x |
| Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 50x |
| Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 25x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 36x |
| HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 27x |
| HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 27x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 91% - Outstanding | Total price: $146 |