MSI G33M (MS-7357)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics11.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMICRO-STAR MS-7357
MotherboardMSI G33M (MS-7357)  (all builds)
Memory5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100112
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 06 '18 at 14:13
Run Duration89 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X5460-$190
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.25 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
52.9% Above average
Memory 75.8
1-Core 46.4
2-Core 92.1
46% 71.4 Pts
4-Core 175
8-Core 184
24% 180 Pts
64-Core 184
11% 184 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6770
Sapphire(174B E144) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
11.4% Very poor
Lighting 15.3
Reflection 11
Parallax 12.8
12% 13 fps
MRender 10.2
Gravity 11.4
Splatting 12.6
10% 11.4 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 11.4%
Great: 11%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
VB0250EAVER 250GB
206GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPG9 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
55.8% Above average
Read 97.3
Write 97
Mixed 92.8
72% 95.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.66
4K Write 1.64
4K Mixed 0.47
109% 0.92 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM SDRAM
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
21.6% Poor
MC Read 7.5
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 6.5
20% 6.87 GB/s
SC Read 5.4
SC Write 5.8
SC Mixed 5.9
16% 5.7 GB/s
Latency 88.8
45% 88.8 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 21.6%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback