Asus F2A85-V

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.98% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive73.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus F2A85-V  (all builds)
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1776 x 1000 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141126
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateJan 06 '18 at 06:39
Run Duration271 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-5800K APU (2012 D.Tr)-$119
FM2 , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
63.6% Good
Memory 90.8
1-Core 71.2
2-Core 137
62% 99.7 Pts
4-Core 214
8-Core 215
29% 214 Pts
64-Core 211
13% 211 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6670
Sapphire(174B E247) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
4.98% Terrible
Lighting 6.43
Reflection 6.96
Parallax 6.84
5% 6.75 fps
MRender 4.62
Gravity 6.33
Splatting 5.39
4% 5.45 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 4.98%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$190
81GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM06B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
73.6% Very good
Read 483
Write 396
Mixed 408
95% 429 MB/s
4K Read 26.1
4K Write 60.2
4K Mixed 16.4
92% 34.2 MB/s
DQ Read 25.4
DQ Write 108
DQ Mixed 16.9
28% 50 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 116%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49
682GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
63.5% Good
Read 108
Write 113
Mixed 119
86% 113 MB/s
4K Read 1.09
4K Write 2.12
4K Mixed 0.53
144% 1.25 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 76%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
485GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
88.8% Excellent
Read 166
Write 143
Mixed 145
114% 152 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.21
100% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 88.8%
Great: 109%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$65
255GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
43.8% Average
Read 83.8
Write 68.5
Mixed 67.5
55% 73.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.41
4K Write 1.87
4K Mixed 0.28
83% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ares DDR3 1866 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
37.4% Below average
MC Read 16.7
MC Write 7.1
MC Mixed 13.5
36% 12.4 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 12.8
29% 10.1 GB/s
Latency 66.2
60% 66.2 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 37.4%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical F2A85-V Builds (Compare 39 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus F2A85-V - $165

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 43% - Average Total price: $667
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback