HP 700-159

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	17% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

System	HP 700-159 (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 2AF7
Memory	1.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20130905
Uptime	10.4 Days
Run Date	Jan 06 '18 at 03:35
Run Duration	714 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4770 498 User benchmarks, average bench 76% , 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	70.2% Very good	Memory 79.2 1-Core 106 2-Core 198 73% 128 Pts	4-Core 330 8-Core 541 53% 436 Pts	64-Core 562 35% 562 Pts
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 70.2% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92 309,423 User benchmarks, average bench 17% Asus(1043 84BB) CLim: 1346 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 382.5 Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	17% Very poor	Lighting 21.1 Reflection 16.1 Parallax 19.1 17% 18.7 fps	MRender 24 Gravity 22 Splatting 16.5 17% 20.9 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 17% Great: 19%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 322GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 226 222 7666 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2233 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 79 79 15822 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1883 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 120 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 107 107 281745 (C2) HDA temperature 124 94 26 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	41.7% Average	Read 77.2 Write 68 Mixed 70.9 54% 72 MB/s	4K Read 0.43 4K Write 1.42 4K Mixed 0.14 60% 0.66 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 41.7% Great: 67%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 255GB free (System drive) Firmware: HP34 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 115 96 85558112 (03) Spinup time 96 95 0 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1775 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 76 60 82289603158 (09) Power-on hours count 83 83 15267 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1750 (B4) Unknown 100 100 1069555125 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 1 1 317 (BC) Unknown 100 100 4295032833 (BD) vendor-specific 84 84 16 (BE) vendor-specific 70 60 520945694 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 53 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 89 89 23239 (C2) HDA temperature 30 40 34359738398 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 8 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	64.3% Good	Read 108 Write 116 Mixed 100 81% 108 MB/s	4K Read 0.44 4K Write 1.38 4K Mixed 0.24 70% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 64.3% Great: 114%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 32GB-$8 33,725 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 10GB free, PID 5581 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	47.2% Average	Read 142 Write 90.5 Mixed 95 131% 109 MB/s	4K Read 5.1 4K Write 1.86 4K Mixed 1.48 133% 2.81 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 47.2% Great: 38%
Generic Flash Disk 2GB 6,669 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 1GB free, PID 6387 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	4.06% Terrible	Read 12.7 Write 4.47 Mixed 6.5 9% 7.88 MB/s	4K Read 5.11 4K Write 0.01 4K Mixed 0.01 20% 1.71 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 4.06% Great: 8%
USB 2.0 Flash Disk 1GB 37 User benchmarks, average bench 2% 1GB free, PID 0151 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	3.14% Terrible	Read 9.89 Write 2.66 Mixed 1.38 4% 4.64 MB/s	4K Read 4.43 4K Write 0.03 4K Mixed 0.03 18% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 3.14% Great: 4%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5471-052.A00LF Samsung M378B1G73QH0-CK0 16GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 1333, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	46.1% Average	MC Read 16.1 MC Write 16.9 MC Mixed 15.6 46% 16.2 GB/s	SC Read 10.4 SC Write 13.7 SC Mixed 13.1 35% 12.4 GB/s	Latency 82 49% 82 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 46.1% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 700-159 Builds (Compare 25 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 66%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: HP 700-159

CPU
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	24x
Xeon E3-1225 v3Intel $170Bench 69%, 4,850 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce GT 635NvidiaBench 6%, 3,722 samples	7x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	3x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	3x

SSD
IT LCS-128L9S-HP 128GBLiteonBench 81%, 2,338 samples	4x
Ultimate SU800 1TBAdata $112Bench 104%, 26,139 samples	3x
SSDNow V300 240GBKingston $35Bench 64%, 176,713 samples	1x

RAM
8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 16JTF1G64AZ-1G6E1 12GBMicronBench 38%, 306 samples	7x
16JTF1G64AZ-1G6E1 2x8GBMicronBench 53%, 7,464 samples	4x
16JTF51264AZ-1G6M1 16JTF1G64AZ-1G6E1 12GBMicronBench 42%, 53 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 101% - Outstanding

Total price: $75

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16