User System

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding HDD
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop 18%
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 16.1%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.67% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive18.6% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
MotherboardCanada SMTB4001
Memory0.4 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170322
Uptime3 Days
Run DateJan 05 '18 at 16:28
Run Duration194 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Atom x5-Z8350
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.45 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
16.1% Very poor
SC Int 30.8
SC Float 17.2
SC Mixed 22.7
19% 23.6 Pts
QC Int 109
QC Float 64.4
QC Mixed 83.2
20% 85.5 Pts
MC Int 104
MC Float 64.4
MC Mixed 80.3
13% 82.8 Pts
Poor: 10%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 16%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics
Intel(8086 7270) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver.
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
1.67% Terrible
Lighting 4
Reflection 4.9
Parallax 6.4
2% 5.1 fps
MRender 3.8
Gravity 4.2
Splatting 5
2% 4.33 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.67%
Great: 3%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Sandisk DF4032 31GB
8GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0.1
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
18.6% Very poor
Read 156
Write 94.4
Mixed 119
27% 123 MB/s
4K Read 7.49
4K Write 10.4
4K Mixed 3.39
21% 7.09 MB/s
DQ Read 7.53
DQ Write 13
DQ Mixed 3.36
4% 7.95 MB/s
Adata DashDrive UV128 USB 3.0 32GB-$7
1GB free, PID db8a
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
10.6% Very poor
Read 33.7
Write 15.8
Mixed 15.4
24% 21.6 MB/s
4K Read 2.65
4K Write 0.53
4K Mixed 0.007
28% 1.06 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 10.6%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
1 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1066 MHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
15.5% Very poor
MC Read 5.5
MC Write 6.3
MC Mixed 4.9
16% 5.57 GB/s
SC Read 2.2
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 2.7
9% 3.17 GB/s
Latency 203
20% 203 ns
Poor: 9%
This bench: 15.5%
Great: 20%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

The Best.
Intel Core i7-8700K $370Nvidia GTX 1070 $335Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $63
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $150Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $210Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $90
Intel Core i5-8600K $260Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $808Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $125SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $70G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $830SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $136SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback