ADD TO PC
BUILD

Acer Aspire 5336

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 12% Tree trunk	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 6.08%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	0.45% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	33.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Acer Aspire 5336 (all builds)
Motherboard	Acer JE51_MV
Memory	2 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110726
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 04 '18 at 19:40
Run Duration	120 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	9%

PC Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron Dual-Core T3500 1,736 User benchmarks, average bench 34% uPGA-478, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 1.95 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	6.08% Terrible	Memory 1.76 1-Core 29.9 2-Core 58.8 14% 30.2 Pts	4-Core 59.8 8-Core 58 8% 58.9 Pts	64-Core 56.8 4% 56.8 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 6.08% Great: 41%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset Family 23,924 User benchmarks, average bench 0% Acer(1025 048A) 1.8GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2702 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.45% Terrible	Lighting 0.53 Reflection 0.46 Parallax 0.5 0% 0.5 fps	MRender 0.43 Gravity 0.57 Splatting 0.7 0% 0.56 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.45% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial BX300 240GB-$43 7,269 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 200GB free (System drive) Firmware: M2CR010 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 3 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 2 (B4) Unknown 100 100 57 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 38 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 100 0 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0 (F6) Unknown 100 100 58918905 (F7) Unknown 100 100 534593 (F8) Unknown 100 100 70073	33.4% Below average	Read 254 Write 203 Mixed 216 50% 224 MB/s	4K Read 6.47 4K Write 14.4 4K Mixed 11.5 32% 10.8 MB/s	DQ Read 13.2 DQ Write 13.3 DQ Mixed 7.25 7% 11.2 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 33.4% Great: 114%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	9.73% Terrible	MC Read 4.3 MC Write 3.3 MC Mixed 3.4 10% 3.67 GB/s	SC Read 2.7 SC Write 1.9 SC Mixed 0.8 5% 1.8 GB/s	Latency 488 8% 488 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 9.73% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical Aspire 5336 Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop

Desktop 32%

Sail boat

Workstation

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire 5336

CPU
Celeron 925IntelBench 31%, 518 samples	8x
Celeron 900IntelBench 30%, 3,169 samples	4x
Core2 Duo T9550Intel $199Bench 39%, 1,427 samples	2x

GPU
Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset FamilyIntelBench 0%, 23,924 samples	15x
Intel 45 Express Chipset FamilyMobileBench 0%, 716 samples	1x

SSD
LCS-256M6S 2.5 7mm 256GBLiteonitBench 83%, 11,477 samples	3x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	2x
MX100 128GBCrucial $74Bench 76%, 9,892 samples	1x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	8x
6GBUnknownBench 25%, 111,301 samples	3x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback