Today's hottest deals

MSI MS-14C4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics81.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive97.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star Prestige 14Evo A11M
MotherboardMSI MS-14C4  (all builds)
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit, Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201007
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 26 '23 at 11:26
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1185G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
75.6% Very good
Memory 68.8
1-Core 132
2-Core 257
82% 153 Pts
4-Core 446
8-Core 618
67% 532 Pts
64-Core 568
35% 568 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.17
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
81.7% Excellent
Lighting 96.5
Reflection 90.5
Parallax 103
79% 96.8 fps
MRender 142
Gravity 98.2
Splatting 90.1
88% 110 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 81.7%
Great: 112%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ256HAJD-000H1 256GB
124GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS4NFXV
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 134 132 133 134 134 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
97.5% Outstanding
Read 886
Write 184
Mixed 236
SusWrite 135
78% 360 MB/s
4K Read 29.5
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 35.3
149% 58.8 MB/s
DQ Read 248
DQ Write 142
DQ Mixed 192
144% 194 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 97.5%
Great: 192%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HCNNNCPMMLXR-NEE 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB Row of chips LPDDR4 clocked @ 4267 MHz
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
120% Outstanding
MC Read 37.3
MC Write 59.6
MC Mixed 43.4
134% 46.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 42
SC Mixed 18.2
71% 24.8 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 98%
This bench: 120%
Great: 127%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 52: 0P 5R 8G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
52% 12% 135 496 372 60 27" 1280 720 PHLC21A PHL 272V8
Typical MS-14C4 Builds (Compare 308 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI MS-14C4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback