| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 35.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 72.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 5 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
| Motherboard | Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA (all builds) |
| Memory | 13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20160113 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 02 '18 at 21:04 |
| Run Duration | 230 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 5% |
PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
60.5%
Good
|
58% 93.4 Pts
|
32% 254 Pts
|
18% 292 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD R9 380-$200
CLim: 990 MHz, MLim: 1425 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.12.1
|
35.7%
Below average
|
37% 51.8 fps
|
33% 40.4 fps
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
42.5%
Average
|
43% 15.1 GB/s
|
27% 9.57 GB/s
|
52% 77.7 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical 970 PRO GAMING/AURA Builds (Compare 900 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA - $299
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 430x |
| FX-6300AMD $57Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 112x |
| FX-8370AMD $175Bench 62%, 34,720 samples | 85x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 85x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 66x |
| RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 51x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 62% - Good | Total price: $588 |