| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
| Graphics | 72.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
10 months ago, 10 months ago.
| Motherboard | Asrock H310CM-IB (all builds) |
| Memory | 12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20190610 |
| Uptime | 5.1 Days |
| Run Date | Nov 21 '23 at 17:45 |
| Run Duration | 111 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 18% |
PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-9400F-$115
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
|
83.2%
Excellent
|
81% 146 Pts
|
69% 539 Pts
|
41% 656 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$201
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 546.17
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
72.9%
Very good
|
75% 88.1 fps
|
69% 87 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$27
557GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 39 35 40 36 36 MB/s
|
17.5%
Very poor
|
21% 28.9 MB/s
|
40% 0.3 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Corsair CMW32GX4M2C3200C16 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
37.1%
Below average
|
35% 12.1 GB/s
|
36% 12.6 GB/s
|
52% 77.6 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
| Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0% | 0% | 0 | 70 | 59 | 60 | 34" | 1280 720 | SAM0F72 S34J55x |
Typical H310CM-IB Builds (Compare 1,027 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock H310CM-IB
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i3-9100FIntel $115Bench 80%, 34,310 samples | 357x |
| Core i5-9400FIntel $115Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 308x |
| Core i7-9700FIntel $273Bench 92%, 54,980 samples | 269x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1650Nvidia $145Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 291x |
| GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $201Bench 71%, 428,800 samples | 260x |
| GTX 1660-TiNvidia $143Bench 76%, 318,562 samples | 188x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 84% - Excellent | Total price: $260 |