Today's hottest deals

MSI B450M MORTAR MAX (MS-7B89)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics28.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive96.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
9 months ago, 9 months ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B89
MotherboardMSI B450M MORTAR MAX (MS-7B89)  (all builds)
Memory6.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201209
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 21 '23 at 16:13
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 14%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G-$60
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
56.2% Above average
Memory 68.7
1-Core 107
2-Core 203
70% 126 Pts
4-Core 253
8-Core 259
34% 256 Pts
64-Core 228
14% 228 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 74%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Nvidia(10DE 1C82) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 546.17
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28.1% Poor
Lighting 34.7
Reflection 41.2
Parallax 43
28% 39.6 fps
MRender 38.3
Gravity 39
Splatting 27.3
28% 34.9 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 28.1%
Great: 33%
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
AMD(1002 15D8) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 22.20.27.09
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
13.2% Very poor
Lighting 17
Reflection 16
Parallax 24.5
14% 19.2 fps
MRender 11.8
Gravity 18
Splatting 14.2
12% 14.7 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 13.2%
Great: 13%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Netac NVMe SSD 512GB
134GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0225A0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 340 446 493 206 172 115 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
96.3% Outstanding
Read 776
Write 456
Mixed 398
SusWrite 296
107% 481 MB/s
4K Read 15.5
4K Write 69.7
4K Mixed 13.6
78% 32.9 MB/s
DQ Read 688
DQ Write 416
DQ Mixed 380
329% 494 MB/s
Poor: 106%
This bench: 96.3%
Great: 296%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3200 C18 Series 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
74.9% Very good
MC Read 30.5
MC Write 25.8
MC Mixed 26.3
79% 27.5 GB/s
SC Read 17.6
SC Write 23.2
SC Mixed 21.7
60% 20.8 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 75 27" 1280 720 MSI3CD1 MSI G274CV
Typical B450M MORTAR MAX (MS-7B89) Builds (Compare 5,337 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer

Motherboard: MSI B450M MORTAR MAX (MS-7B89)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $399
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $278Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback