PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 28.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 96.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows. |
System | Micro-Star MS-7B89 |
Motherboard | MSI B450M MORTAR MAX (MS-7B89) (all builds) |
Memory | 6.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 11 |
BIOS Date | 20201209 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Nov 21 '23 at 16:13 |
Run Duration | 127 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 14% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
56.2%
Above average
|
70% 126 Pts
|
34% 256 Pts
|
14% 228 Pts
|
Graphics Cards | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$100
Nvidia(10DE 1C82) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 546.17
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
28.1%
Poor
|
28% 39.6 fps
|
28% 34.9 fps
|
|
![]() AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
AMD(1002 15D8) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 22.20.27.09
|
13.2%
Very poor
|
14% 19.2 fps
|
12% 14.7 fps
|
|
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Unknown 3200 C18 Series 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
|
74.9%
Very good
|
79% 27.5 GB/s
|
60% 20.8 GB/s
|
39% 103 ns
|
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 70 | 58 | 75 | 27" | 1280 720 | MSI3CD1 MSI G274CV |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
---|---|
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $112Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples | 1,595x |
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $123Bench 73%, 179,588 samples | 422x |
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $204Bench 86%, 635,419 samples | 367x |
![]() |
|
---|---|
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $205Bench 71%, 428,800 samples | 303x |
RTX 2060Nvidia $339Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 259x |
RTX 3060Nvidia $300Bench 100%, 447,556 samples | 229x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 103% - Outstanding | Total price: $394 |