Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.5% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive42.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
System
MotherboardIntel DH55HC
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100722
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateNov 21 '23 at 16:13
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 44%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 870-$100
XU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
66.7% Good
Memory 90.3
1-Core 85
2-Core 157
67% 111 Pts
4-Core 238
8-Core 326
36% 282 Pts
64-Core 336
21% 336 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
MSI(1462 8C93) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.5% Terrible
Lighting 4.2
Reflection 4.4
Parallax 4.5
3% 4.37 fps
MRender 4.3
Gravity 4
Splatting 4.9
4% 4.4 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.5%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$70
176GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3J96R9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 139 120 98 93 88 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
42.2% Average
Read 223
Write 222
Mixed 37.8
SusWrite 119
34% 150 MB/s
4K Read 24.2
4K Write 47.6
4K Mixed 14.7
81% 28.8 MB/s
DQ Read 26.2
DQ Write 77.1
DQ Mixed 35.2
32% 46.2 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 88%
Hitachi HTS541010B7E610 1TB
873GB free
Firmware: 04.01A04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 109 109 110 110 114 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
62.4% Good
Read 105
Write 95.9
Mixed 57.5
SusWrite 110
68% 92.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 7.9
4K Mixed 0.7
262% 3.17 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMT351U6EFR8C-PB HMT351U6CFR8C-PB HMT351U6CFR8C-PB HMT351U6EFR8C-PB 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
41.7% Average
MC Read 15.4
MC Write 13.3
MC Mixed 13
40% 13.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 12.4
SC Mixed 12.2
36% 12.5 GB/s
Latency 66.9
60% 66.9 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 52 18 60 24.1" 1280 720 HWP284B LA2405
Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,893 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback