Asus PRIME H310M-R R2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 48% Yacht	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	5.05% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	46.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (71%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

14 days ago, 14 days ago.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME H310M-R R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	2.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190312
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 21 '23 at 16:12
Run Duration	138 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	71%

PC Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9400-$172 22,187 User benchmarks, average bench 86% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	49.9% Average	Memory 43.3 1-Core 93.2 2-Core 153 53% 96.5 Pts	4-Core 313 8-Core 390 45% 351 Pts	64-Core 442 27% 442 Pts
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 49.9% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 65,338 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Asus(1043 8694) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9805 Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	5.05% Terrible	Lighting 5.8 Reflection 4 Parallax 5.6 5% 5.13 fps	MRender 4.1 Gravity 5.7 Splatting 9.7 6% 6.5 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.05% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial BX300 240GB-$55 7,269 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 106GB free (System drive) Firmware: M2CR010 SusWrite @10s intervals: 202 204 223 208 272 288 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	46.9% Average	Read 170 Write 181 Mixed 202 SusWrite 233 44% 197 MB/s	4K Read 9.7 4K Write 32.1 4K Mixed 15.8 52% 19.2 MB/s	DQ Read 225 DQ Write 212 DQ Mixed 33.1 76% 157 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 46.9% Great: 114%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$29 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 417GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 150 135 130 98 86 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	59.9% Above average	Read 84.4 Write 98.8 Mixed 21.2 SusWrite 124 59% 82.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.6 119% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 59.9% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CRC 1x8GB 22,600 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	21.5% Poor	MC Read 7.2 MC Write 9 MC Mixed 6.8 22% 7.67 GB/s	SC Read 4.4 SC Write 5.7 SC Mixed 4.5 14% 4.87 GB/s	Latency 153 26% 153 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 21.5% Great: 46%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	47	21	60	19"	1280 720	HWP264C HP vs19

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME H310M-R R2.0 Builds (Compare 3,773 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 42%

Speed boat

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H310M-R R2.0

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $108Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	1,672x
Core i3-9100FIntel $115Bench 80%, 34,310 samples	789x
Core i3-8100Intel $110Bench 71%, 81,392 samples	166x

GPU
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	412x
RTX 2060Nvidia $339Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	344x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $205Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	315x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $27Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	465x
SU630 240GBAdataBench 64%, 60,212 samples	216x
SU650 240GBAdata $70Bench 70%, 47,016 samples	181x

RAM
2x8GBAdataBench 77%, 24,552 samples	455x
Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-2400 2x8GBTeamBench 73%, 9,275 samples	142x
1x8GBAdataBench 41%, 25,310 samples	108x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 78% - Very good

Total price: $290

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $270	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $30
Intel Core i5-12400F $149	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $360	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $195	Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $340	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $49

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $42	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $50	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $357	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16