Today's hottest deals

MSI H270M MORTAR ARCTIC (MS-7A69)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics95.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7A69
MotherboardMSI H270M MORTAR ARCTIC (MS-7A69)  (all builds)
Memory9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180702
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 21 '23 at 16:00
Run Duration209 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7400-$70
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
71.7% Very good
Memory 81.6
1-Core 101
2-Core 200
73% 127 Pts
4-Core 355
8-Core 372
48% 364 Pts
64-Core 353
22% 353 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
Nvidia(10DE 119D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (75th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
95.6% Outstanding
Lighting 121
Reflection 130
Parallax 133
99% 128 fps
MRender 92.4
Gravity 126
Splatting 109
90% 109 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 95.6%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
4GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 5,935
Write 2,183
Mixed 3,128
820% 3,749 MB/s
4K Read 273
4K Write 140
4K Mixed 152
683% 188 MB/s
DQ Read 917
DQ Write 631
DQ Mixed 743
563% 764 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GB
192GB free
Firmware: 80002C00
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 864
Write 524
Mixed 626
149% 671 MB/s
4K Read 32.1
4K Write 62.9
4K Mixed 42
136% 45.7 MB/s
DQ Read 573
DQ Write 516
DQ Mixed 603
436% 564 MB/s
Poor: 78% Great: 153%
Micron_M550_2.5"_7mm_512GB 512GB
81GB free
Firmware: DL03
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 362
Write 362
Mixed 281
75% 335 MB/s
4K Read 23.1
4K Write 62.2
4K Mixed 31.2
108% 38.8 MB/s
DQ Read 288
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 226
194% 284 MB/s
Poor: 62% Great: 107%
Kingston DT Mini Slim 4GB
3GB free, PID 160f
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 7.7
Write 3.5
Mixed 5.5
6% 5.57 MB/s
4K Read 4.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
16% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1G43DB0-CPB 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
80.6% Excellent
MC Read 28.9
MC Write 31.7
MC Mixed 26.5
83% 29 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 31.7
SC Mixed 22.7
68% 23.7 GB/s
Latency 77.2
52% 77.2 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 48.5" 1280 720 SAM0A7D SAMSUNG
Typical H270M MORTAR ARCTIC (MS-7A69) Builds (Compare 279 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: MSI H270M MORTAR ARCTIC (MS-7A69)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $267
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $230Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback