Today's hottest deals

Asus Z170-PRO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics123% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus Z170-PRO  (all builds)
Memory9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170125
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 21 '23 at 15:56
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$127
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
77.8% Very good
Memory 83.1
1-Core 113
2-Core 211
77% 136 Pts
4-Core 391
8-Core 592
61% 492 Pts
64-Core 597
37% 597 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 77.8%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$237
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2902 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 537.34
Performing below potential (47th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
123% Outstanding
Lighting 169
Reflection 179
Parallax 170
138% 173 fps
MRender 127
Gravity 173
Splatting 119
113% 140 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 123%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
12GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 427
Write 208
Mixed 339
72% 325 MB/s
4K Read 33.1
4K Write 69.5
4K Mixed 45.2
145% 49.3 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 356
267% 357 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 1TB-$56
398GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 86 91 101 97 99 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 20% Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR4 2666 C15 2x8GB-$169
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
73.8% Very good
MC Read 26.9
MC Write 28
MC Mixed 23.2
74% 26 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 28.3
SC Mixed 23.5
65% 22.8 GB/s
Latency 70.9
56% 70.9 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 58 33 60 34.1" 1280 720 SAM7144 LS34A650U
Typical Z170-PRO Builds (Compare 1,008 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus Z170-PRO - $110

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $640
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $273WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback