MSI MS-16W1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive165% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star Creator 15M A10SD
MotherboardMSI MS-16W1  (all builds)
Memory3.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200519
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 21 '23 at 15:56
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User QAT-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
77.6% Very good
Memory 84.8
1-Core 125
2-Core 228
82% 146 Pts
4-Core 378
8-Core 712
65% 545 Pts
64-Core 873
54% 873 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 77.6%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile Max-Q)
MSI(1462 12CC) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.3699
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 40
Reflection 87.1
Parallax 73
33% 66.7 fps
Gravity 71.1
Splatting 68.2
62% 69.6 fps
Poor: 40% Great: 64%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kbg40znv512g KIOXIA 512GB
103GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AEXA0101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 607 417 665 355 358 261 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
165% Outstanding
Read 1,048
Write 468
Mixed 1,075
SusWrite 444
170% 759 MB/s
4K Read 15.5
4K Write 126
4K Mixed 64.6
173% 68.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,087
DQ Write 706
DQ Mixed 661
556% 818 MB/s
Poor: 107%
This bench: 165%
Great: 213%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya NT8GA64D88CX3S-JR 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
62.7% Good
MC Read 25.6
MC Write 22.9
MC Mixed 18.4
64% 22.3 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 21.9
SC Mixed 18.4
52% 18.1 GB/s
Latency 78.8
51% 78.8 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 206 58 144 15.5" 1920 1057 AUO80ED
Typical MS-16W1 Builds (Compare 4,819 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht

Motherboard: MSI MS-16W1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $199Nvidia RTX 4070 $499WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $350Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback