Dell Precision 5820 Tower

Performance Results

Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics38.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDell Precision 5820 Tower  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0X30MX
Memory54.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230912
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 21 '23 at 15:54
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon W-2245
CPU0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
84% Excellent
Memory 74.2
1-Core 137
2-Core 260
85% 157 Pts
4-Core 503
8-Core 919
85% 711 Pts
64-Core 1,357
84% 1,357 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 84%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia T1000 8GB
Dell(1028 1612) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 536.67
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
38.9% Below average
Lighting 47.2
Reflection 54.1
Parallax 45.5
38% 48.9 fps
MRender 53.1
Gravity 43.7
Splatting 48.6
40% 48.5 fps
Poor: 36%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 39%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SA510 2.5 1000GB
738GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0100
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 52 76 72 80 56 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 54% Great: 112%
Nvme CT1000P5 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: R403 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1554 2069 1954 2114 2007 1143 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
301% Outstanding
Read 2,358
Write 1,701
Mixed 1,836
SusWrite 1,807
432% 1,925 MB/s
4K Read 58.1
4K Write 97.9
4K Mixed 70.5
230% 75.5 MB/s
DQ Read 638
DQ Write 450
DQ Mixed 527
398% 539 MB/s
Poor: 179%
This bench: 301%
Great: 500%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A2K43DB3-CWE 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2934 MHz
Performing below potential (53rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
110% Outstanding
MC Read 39.6
MC Write 56.2
MC Mixed 37.3
127% 44.4 GB/s
SC Read 8.2
SC Write 21.8
SC Mixed 10.5
39% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 92.9
43% 92.9 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 110%
Great: 156%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 60 21.5" 1280 720 ACI22FD ASUS VS228
Typical Precision 5820 Tower Builds (Compare 2,655 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 51%
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation 45%
Speed boat

System: Dell Precision 5820 Tower

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-13600K $232Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback