Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

TEST
YOUR PC

ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus Q170M-C

Performance Results


Gaming 72% Battleship	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 61% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	96.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	68.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus Q170M-C (all builds)
Memory	11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190724
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 21 '23 at 15:54
Run Duration	134 Seconds
Run User	ALB-User
Background CPU	9%

Watch Gameplay: 2060S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700-$135 282,363 User benchmarks, average bench 72% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	72.8% Very good	Memory 80.3 1-Core 93.6 2-Core 201 71% 125 Pts	4-Core 352 8-Core 585 57% 469 Pts	64-Core 525 32% 525 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 72.8% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$270 319,148 User benchmarks, average bench 100% Nvidia(10DE 13A3) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.17 Performing below potential (25^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	96.4% Outstanding	Lighting 116 Reflection 168 Parallax 122 94% 135 fps	MRender 173 Gravity 106 Splatting 100 100% 126 fps
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 96.4% Great: 106%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN256HAJQ-00000 256GB 656 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 48GB free (System drive) Firmware: MVT0300Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 124 135 152 152 127 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	68.1% Good	Read 398 Write 417 Mixed 382 SusWrite 136 75% 333 MB/s	4K Read 31.4 4K Write 60.5 4K Mixed 40.2 131% 44 MB/s	DQ Read 36.8 DQ Write 87.6 DQ Mixed 52.5 43% 59 MB/s
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 68.1% Great: 120%
Intel SSD Pro 1500 Series 180GB-$209 7,834 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 128GB free Firmware: LSTi SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 157 155 155 162 135 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	57.1% Above average	Read 295 Write 204 Mixed 215 SusWrite 153 48% 217 MB/s	4K Read 25.8 4K Write 58.1 4K Mixed 30 108% 38 MB/s	DQ Read 32.1 DQ Write 78.9 DQ Mixed 37.1 34% 49.4 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 57.1% Great: 82%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT8G4DFRA266.M8FJ 2x8GB 118 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	62.6% Good	MC Read 24.6 MC Write 24 MC Mixed 18.4 64% 22.3 GB/s	SC Read 14.1 SC Write 21.5 SC Mixed 17.4 50% 17.7 GB/s	Latency 77.7 52% 77.7 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 62.6% Great: 104%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	56	31	144	24"	1280 720	BNQ7F31 ZOWIE XL LCD

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Q170M-C Builds (Compare 373 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus Q170M-C

CPU
Core i7-6700Intel $135Bench 72%, 282,363 samples	136x
Core i5-6500Intel $49Bench 64%, 241,476 samples	78x
Core i5-6400Intel $57Bench 61%, 171,457 samples	46x

GPU
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	58x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	26x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $215Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	20x

SSD
SSDNow UV400 480GBKingston $175Bench 73%, 24,007 samples	14x
A400 480GBKingston $35Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	12x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $85Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	11x

RAM
9905622-058.A00G 2x8GBKingstonBench 67%, 2,759 samples	11x
KYXC0V-MIB 1x16GBKingstonBench 43%, 487 samples	6x
Fury DDR4 2666 C15 2x8GBHyperX $169Bench 83%, 37,519 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 44% - Average

Total price: $310

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $217	Nvidia RTX 4070 $278	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397