Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 81SY

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics43.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
10 months ago, 9 months ago.
SystemLenovo 81SY  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190829
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 21 '23 at 15:44
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
68% Good
Memory 81.2
1-Core 73.9
2-Core 155
61% 103 Pts
4-Core 297
8-Core 501
48% 399 Pts
64-Core 603
37% 603 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 68%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650 (Mobile)
Legend(17AA 3FFB) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 546.01
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
43.6% Average
Lighting 56.2
Reflection 61.9
Parallax 51.4
46% 56.5 fps
MRender 41.8
Gravity 50.9
Splatting 49.8
39% 47.5 fps
Poor: 28%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron MTFDHBA256TCK 256GB
48GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 005P1LN
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 936
Write 870
Mixed 828
196% 878 MB/s
4K Read 34.1
4K Write 70.7
4K Mixed 47.5
150% 50.8 MB/s
DQ Read 768
DQ Write 561
DQ Mixed 624
477% 651 MB/s
Poor: 111% Great: 210%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
925GB free
Firmware: LFM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 130 126 127 126 126 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
70.4% Very good
Read 118
Write 130
Mixed 57.6
SusWrite 127
79% 108 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
179% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
79% Very good
MC Read 30.6
MC Write 31.1
MC Mixed 23.1
81% 28.3 GB/s
SC Read 16.3
SC Write 27.4
SC Mixed 22.4
63% 22 GB/s
Latency 62.5
64% 62.5 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 79%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 57 60 15.5" 1280 720 AUO21ED
Typical 81SY Builds (Compare 2,340 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 81SY

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $217Nvidia RTX 4070 $278Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback