Acer Predator PH315-53

Performance Results

Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics6.25% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive262% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAcer Predator PH315-53  (all builds)
MotherboardCML QX50_CMS
Memory25.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210108
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 21 '23 at 15:44
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10870H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
86% Excellent
Memory 89.3
1-Core 128
2-Core 238
86% 152 Pts
4-Core 444
8-Core 773
74% 609 Pts
64-Core 1094
68% 1094 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 86%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Acer(1025 1441) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver.
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
6.25% Terrible
Lighting 6.7
Reflection 9.2
Parallax 8.7
6% 8.2 fps
MRender 10.5
Gravity 6.7
Splatting 10.9
8% 9.37 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.25%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.2.F.83
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2268 1986 1707 1528 1419 1431 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
262% Outstanding
Read 1,561
Write 2,248
Mixed 1474
SusWrite 1,723
397% 1,751 MB/s
4K Read 46.2
4K Write 95.2
4K Mixed 61.4
199% 67.6 MB/s
DQ Read 803
DQ Write 631
DQ Mixed 714
535% 716 MB/s
Poor: 256%
This bench: 262%
Great: 625%
179GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 78 78 77 78 77 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
62.7% Good
Read 138
Write 124
Mixed 69.9
SusWrite 79.4
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 0.3
140% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4SFRA32A.M16FR Hynix HMAA2GS6AJR8N-XN 32GB
3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
76.9% Very good
MC Read 29.2
MC Write 30
MC Mixed 21.8
77% 27 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 32
SC Mixed 24.3
69% 24 GB/s
Latency 64.3
62% 64.3 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 76.9%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 144 15.5" 1280 720 BOE08B3
Typical Predator PH315-53 Builds (Compare 6,180 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop 75%
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Predator PH315-53

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $199Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $378WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback