Today's hottest deals

Asrock A320M-HDV R3.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics15.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsrock A320M-HDV R3.0  (all builds)
Memory9.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221108
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateNov 21 '23 at 15:43
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User MDA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600AF-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
72.1% Very good
Memory 75.6
1-Core 105
2-Core 211
73% 130 Pts
4-Core 370
8-Core 595
59% 483 Pts
64-Core 732
45% 732 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$90
Zotac(19DA 1384) 2GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 537.34
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
15.6% Very poor
Lighting 19.3
Reflection 16.5
Parallax 19.3
16% 18.4 fps
MRender 22.8
Gravity 20.4
Splatting 15.2
16% 19.5 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 15.6%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ts120gmt S820S 120GB
19GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U100
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 480
Write 403
Mixed 128
246% 337 MB/s
4K Read 27.2
4K Write 56.8
4K Mixed 1.9
2,396% 28.6 MB/s
DQ Read 103
DQ Write 214
DQ Mixed 40.3
720% 119 MB/s
Toshiba P300 1TB-$32
768GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 157 179 166 177 169 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
84.3% Excellent
Read 126
Write 136
Mixed 15.2
SusWrite 168
80% 111 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
145% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 84.3%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
83.8% Excellent
MC Read 33.2
MC Write 29.1
MC Mixed 28.8
87% 30.4 GB/s
SC Read 21.5
SC Write 29
SC Mixed 24.7
72% 25.1 GB/s
Latency 87.3
46% 87.3 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 83.8%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 33: 0P 2R 4G 11B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
33% 17% 98 211 60 75 21.7" 1280 720 GSM5B55 LG FULL HD
Typical A320M-HDV R3.0 Builds (Compare 337 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HDV R3.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $188
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback